'Budget' LSVTEC CR-X dies!... 89x85 B20VTEC rises from the ashes! **PICS**
#28
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Re: (xD***tonesx)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by xD***tonesx »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Derrick Robinson and his daddy blowin **** up like big dogs </TD></TR></TABLE>
What happened to your user title and avatar, Dickie?
- Derek
What happened to your user title and avatar, Dickie?
- Derek
#32
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Re: (goforbroke)
<u>UPDATE:</u>
The car saw the dyno yesterday.
The final numbers were 200.7whp and 148wtq.
A gain of a solid 20whp and 19lb.-ft. were realized from simply an increase in displacement. Also, the powerband moved lower in the rev-range compared to the 1.8 setup.
I'll post the dyno sheet up later, with a comparison of the two setups.
- Derek
The car saw the dyno yesterday.
The final numbers were 200.7whp and 148wtq.
A gain of a solid 20whp and 19lb.-ft. were realized from simply an increase in displacement. Also, the powerband moved lower in the rev-range compared to the 1.8 setup.
I'll post the dyno sheet up later, with a comparison of the two setups.
- Derek
#39
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Re: (goforbroke)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by votoms888 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Did you need to machine the rods to fit on the RS Machines pistons?</TD></TR></TABLE>
Nope.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by goforbroke »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">So pop's car is going to smash your car even more now.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Hells yes.
The car went 12.75 @ 107mph on a bogged launch with 181whp.
I finally got the chance to drive it this morning. Dear God.
- Derek
Nope.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by goforbroke »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">So pop's car is going to smash your car even more now.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Hells yes.
The car went 12.75 @ 107mph on a bogged launch with 181whp.
I finally got the chance to drive it this morning. Dear God.
- Derek
#40
official honda whore
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: not tellin you where, pa, usa
Posts: 8,454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (D-Rob)
wow impressive, i guess not resizing the rods was a good/bad thing, you realized it is something that should be done, and now his car is even more badass!!!
now he should upgrade that header and go with a cam similar to yours and he will have a MONSTER of a crx
now he should upgrade that header and go with a cam similar to yours and he will have a MONSTER of a crx
#47
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Re: (votoms888)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by chad »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">sleeves WILL crack!!! SOON....very SOON!!
85 mm is too much on a b20 block without sleeving and even with a block guard
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Here's to hoping you're incorrect, then.
- Derek
85 mm is too much on a b20 block without sleeving and even with a block guard
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Here's to hoping you're incorrect, then.
- Derek
#48
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Middle River, MD, USA
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (D-Rob)
Do you think that chamfering the rod journals on the crank would help out when using a 95mm crank. I was thinking that with the extra oil for the rod bearings that it may reduce some of the extra stress put on the rod bearings from the stroker crank. What do you think?
#49
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Re: (frostyrb)
I'm sure it wouldn't hurt, but I doubt it's going to significantly increase bearing life.
95mm is still going to be putting a pounding on those rod bearings.
- Derek
95mm is still going to be putting a pounding on those rod bearings.
- Derek