Kumho or Yokohama?
#1
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Kumho or Yokohama?
kinda debating between kumho supra 712's and yokohama parada spec 2's.. the cost difference is only about $11 a tire, so i'm not really sure which i should get. both seem like great tires, and both seem pretty reasonable for daily street driving. the falken azenis area great, but they wear too fast.
#2
Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 1,245
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Kumho or Yokohama? (VTECDC2)
Probably depends on how much driving will be done in the rain. For me, I needed a tire that I could drive through heavy rain and still be safe. I don't know how the Parada is in the rain but the design doesn't look too rain friendly.
#3
Re: Kumho or Yokohama? (Volcom)
Well if treadwear is an issue, dont get the paradas. Ive had 3 sets of kumhos, and for the money I think they are really rather decent.
#4
Re: Kumho or Yokohama? (VTECDC2)
I sell tire for a living and I wouldn't be caught dead wth the kuhmo (or maybe I would) I bought the parada Spec2 the performance is much greater.
97 LS
97 LS
#5
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Los Burritos, KOALA, Ugondia
Posts: 739
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Kumho or Yokohama? (VTECDC2)
I have supra 712's on my Prelude...they don't grip as well as my Potenza re730's did when cornering. Normal driving seems fine so far.
kinda debating between kumho supra 712's and yokohama parada spec 2's.. the cost difference is only about $11 a tire, so i'm not really sure which i should get. both seem like great tires, and both seem pretty reasonable for daily street driving. the falken azenis area great, but they wear too fast.
#6
Re: Kumho or Yokohama? (VTECDC2)
I'm a little drunk right now but I think I can answer this coherently
Kumho's grip in the dry is enough to scare the **** out of your friends. Wet grip is excellent. I wouldn't rule out the Yokahoma AVS ES 100's or Falken Azenis if rain and treadware aren't concerns.
Beer ownz me
Kumho's grip in the dry is enough to scare the **** out of your friends. Wet grip is excellent. I wouldn't rule out the Yokahoma AVS ES 100's or Falken Azenis if rain and treadware aren't concerns.
Beer ownz me
#7
Re: Kumho or Yokohama? (kotetu)
Y even bother with the Kumhos are just a new kid on the block while the Paradas has been around for quite some time...my friend had a Kumho and they are loud tires on regular driving...and they dont even have that good grip...i guess what will u expect from a new tire that just recently came out on the market...
Trending Topics
#8
New User
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Wayland, MI, US
Posts: 2,462
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Kumho or Yokohama? (facacc10)
I sell tire for a living and I wouldn't be caught dead wth the kuhmo (or maybe I would) I bought the parada Spec2 the performance is much greater.
97 LS
97 LS
Look in the review & survey sections. Very useful.
#9
Re: Kumho or Yokohama? (TimoneX)
i have kuhmo's on my car now. they are coming off next week in favor of some pirelli's or dunlop w10's. I will never buy a set of kuhmo's again! they perform well in the rain...thats it. dont ever go racing witht hem unless u like sliding all over the place
#10
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Kumho or Yokohama? (TimoneX)
I sell tire for a living and I wouldn't be caught dead wth the kuhmo (or maybe I would) I bought the parada Spec2 the performance is much greater.
97 LS
That's way harsh. The Kuhmos are probably better than 85% of the tires out on the road everyday. The masses just go into a tire shop and buy whatever the salesman is pushing. The Kuhmos are a great value, but the parada spec 2 may well be worth the small premium. I noticed a big difference in price between the 2 at 205/40-17 and only a small one at 205/45-17. I've been on Kuhmos for over a year, but I think I'll try the Yokos next spring. There's lots of info on these two at: http://www.tirerack.com/
Look in the review & survey sections. Very useful.
97 LS
That's way harsh. The Kuhmos are probably better than 85% of the tires out on the road everyday. The masses just go into a tire shop and buy whatever the salesman is pushing. The Kuhmos are a great value, but the parada spec 2 may well be worth the small premium. I noticed a big difference in price between the 2 at 205/40-17 and only a small one at 205/45-17. I've been on Kuhmos for over a year, but I think I'll try the Yokos next spring. There's lots of info on these two at: http://www.tirerack.com/
Look in the review & survey sections. Very useful.
#11
New User
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: San Jose, Ca, US
Posts: 1,487
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Kumho or Yokohama? (VTECDC2)
kumho's are good under normal driving, so are those pep boy brand tires.
when you are trying to fly during the turns, kumho's are your tires because they
wont girp the road. if you want some good tires why not spend the extra 5 - 20 bucks and get something decent. yok es100's are very good for the price. spend a lot more and get some so-3. so-3 are the best tires i've had so far. doesnt really squeel in a HARD turn. and trust me i takes those turns pretty hard. so-3's only squeel when they warm up quite a bit. even then its very quiet.
**** *** hoes (kumho's)
when you are trying to fly during the turns, kumho's are your tires because they
wont girp the road. if you want some good tires why not spend the extra 5 - 20 bucks and get something decent. yok es100's are very good for the price. spend a lot more and get some so-3. so-3 are the best tires i've had so far. doesnt really squeel in a HARD turn. and trust me i takes those turns pretty hard. so-3's only squeel when they warm up quite a bit. even then its very quiet.
**** *** hoes (kumho's)
#12
New User
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Wayland, MI, US
Posts: 2,462
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Kumho or Yokohama? (Chois i-VTEC)
There must be 2 different versions of these Kuhmo ES 712s or something. I take turns at very high speeds constantly and my tires do not lose grip. They're roughly equal to my last set of bridgestones save that they're better in the rain and have lasted 3x as long. Not the best tire ever but half the price of the S-03 poles or Firehawks, with most of the performance.
#15
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Bangkok / Bay Area, Thailand
Posts: 799
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Kumho or Yokohama? (TimoneX)
Seriously, maybe some of you got a defective batch or something, but I've been pretty satisfied with my Kumho's. Their loud yeah, but their also cheap, durable, and give a decent amount of grip for the $.
#16
New User
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: RAIDER NATION, CA, USA
Posts: 6,415
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Kumho or Yokohama? (STi -RA)
ive heard good things about kumhos... obviously they arent the best tire around... so what the hell do you expect for the price you pay.
#17
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: diamond bar/rowland, CA, 91765
Posts: 757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Kumho or Yokohama? (smkngsr)
actually Kumho was around for a long time. It originated from Korea and was recently mass sold here in America, maybe thats why it may seem new to you.
#18
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: East Bay/Pasadena, CA, United States
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Kumho or Yokohama? (spoonek4)
Paradas are just for SHOW kinda tires for me. Maybe u should think about Kumho 712 and Dunlop FM901 instead.
#19
Re: Kumho or Yokohama? ([626]99-GSR)
kumho's are great tires for the price. they grip very well on high speeds... i did about 143mph today.. ( topped out my car.. ) and i had to swerve a few times from a few cars. it has excellent grip.
#20
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: East Bay/Pasadena, CA, United States
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Kumho or Yokohama? (aznmc16)
damn where did you bust 143 today??? I only busted 110-115 and yeah i agree the kumhos worked well swerving in and out of lanes.
#22
New User
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Wayland, MI, US
Posts: 2,462
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Kumho or Yokohama? (neo1z)
I've never seen a tire that compares to the stock Michelins that came on my car. I can't believe Honda would even allow anyone to put such a tire on any car let alone a car in their Acura line. Mine had about 80% tread left and if there was even a light sprinkle I had to park or hydroplane into a wall. Replacing that total garbage remains as the best mod I've ever made to my car...even though the tires I replaced them with are now gone.
#23
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: diamond bar/rowland, CA, 91765
Posts: 757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Kumho or Yokohama? (TimoneX)
yeah i agree stock michelin tires are really bad. you cant even drag race because you'll be stuck in the start line peeling out.
#24
Re: Kumho or Yokohama? (lMlElNaCe-)
i think the kumho's are okay tires. They grip very well for zippy daily driving, pushed to 9/10th, you feel discomfort so you slow down before losing it. I had potenza re-730's on my old car. More confidence inspiring with little warning before they break loose. Dangerous combo for me.
#25
Re: Kumho or Yokohama? ([626]99-GSR)
damn where did you bust 143 today??? I only busted 110-115 and yeah i agree the kumhos worked well swerving in and out of lanes.