92 integra ls/gs/gsr ?????
#26
Re: 92 integra ls/gs/gsr ?????
Actually hes right. It is widely known that putting a GSR/b16/ITR trans on a LS motor would result in much better acceleration, and yes it would keep up or even beat a GSR. It brings the LS motor to life, and is the best performance modification one can do besides FI.
#27
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 2,351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 92 integra ls/gs/gsr ?????
That makes no sense. Because the GSR and the LS both had the same YS1 tranny, and the B17 is faster. You can say to put a short geared tranny on any motor and it will beat another but you can't compare that way... Both engines have to have the same tranny in order to compare how fast the car is based on the engine.
When it comes to FI, the longer the gears the better, and in that case it would be the inverse.
#28
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Sherman Oaks, CA, United States
Posts: 7,539
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Re: 92 integra ls/gs/gsr ?????
Under no circumstance are longer gears "better". Period. Gearing is a torque multiplier. Shorter gears = more wheel torque. More torque = more acceleration.
If you ever truly believe that longer gears are better, go start the car from a stop in 5th. That's the longest gear the car has, so why isn't it better for acceleration than any of the lower gears?
#29
Re: 92 integra ls/gs/gsr ?????
We're not talking about turboing. A 140hp motor is slower than a 160hp motor with the same tranny. And you CAN'T compare a motor when they have different trannys because you're now comparing DRIVETRAINS not ENGINES.
#30
I like to party
iTrader: (1)
Re: 92 integra ls/gs/gsr ?????
Wow.
Under no circumstance are longer gears "better". Period. Gearing is a torque multiplier. Shorter gears = more wheel torque. More torque = more acceleration.
If you ever truly believe that longer gears are better, go start the car from a stop in 5th. That's the longest gear the car has, so why isn't it better for acceleration than any of the lower gears?
Under no circumstance are longer gears "better". Period. Gearing is a torque multiplier. Shorter gears = more wheel torque. More torque = more acceleration.
If you ever truly believe that longer gears are better, go start the car from a stop in 5th. That's the longest gear the car has, so why isn't it better for acceleration than any of the lower gears?
#31
Re: 92 integra ls/gs/gsr ?????
BTW, a YS1 tranny is STOCK in all DA's and DB's including the B17 GSR. They have the EXACT same gear ratio as B16 trannys and the YS1 used in all 2nd gen integras was the same one used on the JDM XSI and RSI's
#32
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 2,351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 92 integra ls/gs/gsr ?????
You forget a lot of variables my friend, like driver, tires, etc. You cannot base your last statement on gear ratios. They can help, but are not guaranteed.
#33
I like to party
iTrader: (1)
Re: 92 integra ls/gs/gsr ?????
Wow.
Under no circumstance are longer gears "better". Period. Gearing is a torque multiplier. Shorter gears = more wheel torque. More torque = more acceleration.
If you ever truly believe that longer gears are better, go start the car from a stop in 5th. That's the longest gear the car has, so why isn't it better for acceleration than any of the lower gears?
Under no circumstance are longer gears "better". Period. Gearing is a torque multiplier. Shorter gears = more wheel torque. More torque = more acceleration.
If you ever truly believe that longer gears are better, go start the car from a stop in 5th. That's the longest gear the car has, so why isn't it better for acceleration than any of the lower gears?
#34
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 2,351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 92 integra ls/gs/gsr ?????
Wow.
Under no circumstance are longer gears "better". Period. Gearing is a torque multiplier. Shorter gears = more wheel torque. More torque = more acceleration.
If you ever truly believe that longer gears are better, go start the car from a stop in 5th. That's the longest gear the car has, so why isn't it better for acceleration than any of the lower gears?
Under no circumstance are longer gears "better". Period. Gearing is a torque multiplier. Shorter gears = more wheel torque. More torque = more acceleration.
If you ever truly believe that longer gears are better, go start the car from a stop in 5th. That's the longest gear the car has, so why isn't it better for acceleration than any of the lower gears?
When it comes to FI, you need longer gears. The 4.56 and 4.77s dont do any good when pushing out over 500whp. They are not recommended. No one is saying start off in 5th, thats besides the point. But, in my case, owning an turbo s2000 with 4.56 gears right now is not beneficial for me. If i was NA, then yes, it would be great.
Like i said, no one is stating to drop down to a very low FD, but in my case, my stock gearing is 4.10, which is what is recommended when you go into high hp numbers.
#35
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 2,351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 92 integra ls/gs/gsr ?????
JUST to play Devil's advocate, in rare instances a longer tranny WILL be faster than a shorter one in forced induction applications, but it is due to time lost shifting, as well as time spent outside of the compressors "sweet spot". However, while I'm sure this is the concept JDMTypeRDC2 was trying to make, he had no actual grasp on the subject, as well as it not really applying here.
You pick a great time to post stupid **** because someone questioned me. If you guys would do some reading, you would know that the torque multiplier applies to NA setups. A shorter geared FD in a boosted car will hurt your performance rather than help it. I didnt want to be rude, but you are honestly pissing me off...I dont want to have to go copy and paste a link about this so that you can comprehend better.
#37
I like to party
iTrader: (1)
Re: 92 integra ls/gs/gsr ?????
You should really be the last person talking or playing "devils advocate"...With some of the idiotic responses you have given in other threads, im surprised no one has gotten on your case yet.
You pick a great time to post stupid **** because someone questioned me. If you guys would do some reading, you would know that the torque multiplier applies to NA setups. A shorter geared FD in a boosted car will hurt your performance rather than help it. I didnt want to be rude, but you are honestly pissing me off...I dont want to have to go copy and paste a link about this so that you can comprehend better.
You pick a great time to post stupid **** because someone questioned me. If you guys would do some reading, you would know that the torque multiplier applies to NA setups. A shorter geared FD in a boosted car will hurt your performance rather than help it. I didnt want to be rude, but you are honestly pissing me off...I dont want to have to go copy and paste a link about this so that you can comprehend better.
#38
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: SM, Cali
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 92 integra ls/gs/gsr ?????
This thread is off topic. Stock Vs. Stock
B17A>B18A
End of story.
It would be an endless debate. What ifs, If I did, what about.
People wouldn't have paid thousands more for an inferior car.
People that bought 92 GSR Tegs back in 1992 would slap you in the face if you said an LS was better than a GSR. Go ask a dealer and 1/4 miles prove it. End of story
As far as a tranny goes, B16 tranny on a B18A sucks *** on a daily commute.
It will help to a certain point, but it will eventually top out due to the shorter gearing while the B17 keeps reving high and spanking that ***.
B17A>B18A
End of story.
It would be an endless debate. What ifs, If I did, what about.
People wouldn't have paid thousands more for an inferior car.
People that bought 92 GSR Tegs back in 1992 would slap you in the face if you said an LS was better than a GSR. Go ask a dealer and 1/4 miles prove it. End of story
As far as a tranny goes, B16 tranny on a B18A sucks *** on a daily commute.
It will help to a certain point, but it will eventually top out due to the shorter gearing while the B17 keeps reving high and spanking that ***.
#39
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 2,351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 92 integra ls/gs/gsr ?????
I think you might have deleted it actually but i specifically love the one where you said "you can convert it to a 4dr type r, have you heard of those. Check them out, theyre cool" haha...After that statement, I stopped taking you seriously in every thread you post something in...
Back the question. Read up on gear ratios, and how they affect acceleration in both NA and FI applications, as well as daily driven cars vs track cars, and how they affect your top speed and shift points...When you know enough about that, come back and put your input on it.
Last edited by JdmTypeRdc2; 12-17-2010 at 12:25 PM.
#40
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: SM, Cali
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 92 integra ls/gs/gsr ?????
B18A w/ B18A tranny > B17A with B18A tranny
B18A w/ B17A tranny < B17A with B17A tranny
It must go accordingly to it's application. B16 tranny on an LS motor sucks *** and is needed on the 1/8. Anything past that, will have it reving so high and will eventually kill your engine.
#41
I like to party
iTrader: (1)
Re: 92 integra ls/gs/gsr ?????
Let me not even get started. You are not worth my time, seriously. I can go on and on about your dumb responses and sarcastic comments that youve posted...
I think you might have deleted it actually but i specifically love the one where you said "you can convert it to a 4dr type r, have you heard of those. Check them out, theyre cool" haha...After that statement, I stopped taking you seriously in every thread you post something in...
I think you might have deleted it actually but i specifically love the one where you said "you can convert it to a 4dr type r, have you heard of those. Check them out, theyre cool" haha...After that statement, I stopped taking you seriously in every thread you post something in...
Feel free to try and dig through my past posts... you'll find nothing but helpful posts with a sprinkling of snide remarks to dumb people. Sorry you fit into the latter.
#42
Re: 92 integra ls/gs/gsr ?????
b17 ys1 trannys are different from b18 ys1 trannys. i have a original b17 integra and have whooped on a ls da with b16 tranny and same bolt ons as me. also a ls da runing a 50 shot and bolt ons.
#43
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 2,351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 92 integra ls/gs/gsr ?????
That wasn't me homeboy. But I'm confused, are you mad because someone suggested converting to a 4dr itr, or because someone thought they were cool? Either way, you mad.
Feel free to try and dig through my past posts... you'll find nothing but helpful posts with a sprinkling of snide remarks to dumb people. Sorry you fit into the latter.
Feel free to try and dig through my past posts... you'll find nothing but helpful posts with a sprinkling of snide remarks to dumb people. Sorry you fit into the latter.
Like i said, I know what you post. "I Is NoT mAd, HoMeBoY"....do some reading, get back to me when you know about gear ratios. Instead of agreeing with other posters, learn how to make up your own mind and not swaying with everyone elses answers. Maybe you will be more credible that way.
#44
I like to party
iTrader: (1)
Re: 92 integra ls/gs/gsr ?????
Ok there Mr. Ive been building hondas since before people were born...Im sorry i reigned on your parade by pointing out your dumb responses and pitiful attempts to flame people.
Like i said, I know what you post. "I Is NoT mAd, HoMeBoY"....do some reading, get back to me when you know about gear ratios. Instead of agreeing with other posters, learn how to make up your own mind and not swaying with everyone elses answers. Maybe you will be more credible that way.
Like i said, I know what you post. "I Is NoT mAd, HoMeBoY"....do some reading, get back to me when you know about gear ratios. Instead of agreeing with other posters, learn how to make up your own mind and not swaying with everyone elses answers. Maybe you will be more credible that way.
#45
Re: 92 integra ls/gs/gsr ?????
ps b17 ys1 trannys are different from b18 ys1 trannys
http://www.ff-squad.com/tech/temp/Bgears.htm
#46
I like to party
iTrader: (1)
Re: 92 integra ls/gs/gsr ?????
i agree for some reason the da ls integras always beat the dc ls integras. ive had both and da was faster. look on youtube the da's always win.
ps b17 ys1 trannys are different from b18 ys1 trannys
http://www.ff-squad.com/tech/temp/Bgears.htm
ps b17 ys1 trannys are different from b18 ys1 trannys
http://www.ff-squad.com/tech/temp/Bgears.htm
Those are the correct ratios. IDK where FFsquad got those other ones...
BTW - check out the 92-93 ratios compared to the 96 spec ITR. Interesting, eh?