99-00 JDM B20B/B20Z torque chamber clearance issues in EG?
#1
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
99-00 JDM B20B/B20Z torque chamber clearance issues in EG?
for those who wondered, yes it does fits, no rubbing, no problems at all.
btw. here is my new setup:
-'00 JDM Orthia B20B (no need for drivers side mount change, it works with 92-3 Sohc EG mount)
-Y21 LSD tranny
-JUN clutch/flywheel
- http://www.hyperducktuning.com custom P75 proggy
+ more goodies soon to come
btw. here is my new setup:
-'00 JDM Orthia B20B (no need for drivers side mount change, it works with 92-3 Sohc EG mount)
-Y21 LSD tranny
-JUN clutch/flywheel
- http://www.hyperducktuning.com custom P75 proggy
+ more goodies soon to come
#4
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Re: 99-00 JDM B20B/B20Z torque chamber clearance issues in EG? (Ivan)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Ivan »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">throw on some crower cams. no need for vtec </TD></TR></TABLE>
i think it sounds like a good plan.
http://www.crower.com/cgi-bin/...62404
i think it sounds like a good plan.
http://www.crower.com/cgi-bin/...62404
#6
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: In Training on Dagobah with Yoda
Posts: 1,720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 99-00 JDM B20B/B20Z torque chamber clearance issues in EG? (eg6ajk)
Looking good man! I know that doesnt help answer the question, but just thought that i would tell you!
Trending Topics
#9
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Magitek factory, Vector
Posts: 5,672
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 99-00 JDM B20B/B20Z torque chamber clearance issues in EG? (SlowCivicHmm)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SlowCivicHmm »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">What are the benefits of using that instead of a LS manifold??
Looks like a nice ride!</TD></TR></TABLE> my question exactly....
Looks like a nice ride!</TD></TR></TABLE> my question exactly....
#10
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Re: 99-00 JDM B20B/B20Z torque chamber clearance issues in EG? (SlowCivicHmm)
thanks.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by vivid02 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">How does the extra torque fell compared to the B16 you once had in there? </TD></TR></TABLE>
compared to JDM D15b or ZC sohc vtec its not even close, its like totally different car.
compared to B16A its a night and day difference especially intown and on the highway. and with the tranny its always in the power band. I am in 5th gear at all times even at 40mph just add gas and you're gone.
now versus my old b18c (180+whp/130lb/ft) its quite comparable but slightly more torquey down low.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SlowCivicHmm »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">What are the benefits of using that instead of a LS manifold??
Looks like a nice ride!</TD></TR></TABLE>
B20B with a low-rise (ala P75/LS or even older 96-8 JDM orthia intake) suffered from a flat spot between 3.2-4k rpm or so. the chamber solved that and the torque/power curve is alot smoother. possibly at the expense of the top end but its defiantly worth the extra weight
more B20 tech :
http://hybrid2.honda-perf.org/tech/b20/
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by vivid02 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">How does the extra torque fell compared to the B16 you once had in there? </TD></TR></TABLE>
compared to JDM D15b or ZC sohc vtec its not even close, its like totally different car.
compared to B16A its a night and day difference especially intown and on the highway. and with the tranny its always in the power band. I am in 5th gear at all times even at 40mph just add gas and you're gone.
now versus my old b18c (180+whp/130lb/ft) its quite comparable but slightly more torquey down low.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SlowCivicHmm »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">What are the benefits of using that instead of a LS manifold??
Looks like a nice ride!</TD></TR></TABLE>
B20B with a low-rise (ala P75/LS or even older 96-8 JDM orthia intake) suffered from a flat spot between 3.2-4k rpm or so. the chamber solved that and the torque/power curve is alot smoother. possibly at the expense of the top end but its defiantly worth the extra weight
more B20 tech :
http://hybrid2.honda-perf.org/tech/b20/
#13
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: salem, or, usa
Posts: 1,307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 99-00 JDM B20B/B20Z torque chamber clearance issues in EG? (Redline96LX)
he is referring to the intake manifold. And its oddness. I used to own a crv and it had that exact intake manifold setup. It is supposed to create more torque in the bottom end of the power band.. Where most of the crv owners like myself greatly lacked.... Whoever over there at honda decided that a 2.0 was good enough for a small suv style vehicle, obviously never put 2 fat kids in the back seat.... talk about 1 slow ride.
#14
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Re: 99-00 JDM B20B/B20Z torque chamber clearance issues in EG? (mattssi)
damn thats an old post...
much 'newer' B20 swap I have done
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1368086
much 'newer' B20 swap I have done
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1368086
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
eg6_rick
Want to Buy
3
03-22-2005 04:58 PM
eg6ajk
Hybrid / Engine Swaps
12
05-27-2003 06:42 PM