Print  Email  Subscribe  RSS  Help
 Bigger wheels/less MPG?First  1 2 >  Last
Author Post

fitness
(trial)



Offline

1 posts [100%]
Killen Al
5-28-2008
  Bigger wheels/less MPG?« » Reply  Edit


I'm shopping for some new wheels and I found some 17's that weigh in at about
20lbs and I was wondering if any of you guys running 17's have noticed and adverse effect on fuel economy. That is if you are running 205/40/17 which should be stock rolling diameter. I need to know if the increase in rotational mass if going to be worth the look. How much do stock 16" alloys weigh?

Thanks.




E-AT_me




Offline

2947 posts [100%]
Strasburg VA
9-23-2001
 « Re: Bigger wheels/less MPG? (fitness)« » Reply  Edit


stock wheels are 15 inch. more mass will definately reduce MPG, will reduce acceleration, will increase deceleration and will also effect handling.



1986 civic Si..

awaiting B16a.


BudgetFitting




Offline

135 posts [100%]
San Clemente CA
4-22-2008
 « Re: Bigger wheels/less MPG? (E-AT_me)« » Reply  Edit


Quote, originally posted by E-AT_me »
stock wheels are 15 inch. more mass will definately reduce MPG, will reduce acceleration, will increase deceleration and will also effect handling.

Exactly.

On top of all this, 17" rims don't look good on a Fit.



R.I.P. 300 WHP Single Cam


c_mack9




Offline

1493 posts [100%]
paducah ky
2-9-2005
 « « » Reply  Edit


and on top of all of that, 20lbs is heavy as hell. wheels should be around 1 pound per inch or less. mine are 16s but i think im gettin better milege because they are really light.



[OS^e]
KillerFit #14

Quote, originally posted by myJDM89EF »
people in kentucky be rollin in some sick whips
Quote, originally posted by Iwish4typeR »
kentucky's got game.

Quote, originally posted by Modest Mouse »
well then, kentucky does ball outta control indeed.



E-AT_me




Offline

2947 posts [100%]
Strasburg VA
9-23-2001
 « Re: (c_mack9)« » Reply  Edit


personally i like 17's on a fit.



1986 civic Si..

awaiting B16a.


E-AT_me




Offline

2947 posts [100%]
Strasburg VA
9-23-2001
 « Re: (c_mack9)« » Reply  Edit


personally i like 17's on a fit.



1986 civic Si..

awaiting B16a.


p nut




Offline

4815 posts [99%]
Rockies
5-11-2002
 « « » Reply  Edit


17's look too big for a Fit, IMO. 16's are the biggest I would go. But to answer your question, yes, more mass on the outside of the wheel will result in less MPG. Your handling will actually be more crisp, due to the stiffer/shorter sidewalls, but accel, MPG will all suffer. I'd go with 16's and call it good.

And, yeah, like the other guy said, 20lbs is really heavy.



Current: Toy Taco TRD 4x4 Klein Quantum Race Salomon 1080

Sold: AP1/DC2R/DC4(x2)/EJ1


cereal face
* B A N N E D *



Offline

64 posts [100%]
5-22-2008
 « Re: (p nut)« » Reply  Edit


yeah, 16's look great on the fit. as a rule of thumb, only go 1" bigger than stock IMO

Canyonman




Offline

8 posts [100%]
Canyon Lake CA
4-19-2008
 « Re: Rubber« » Reply  Edit


What's wrong with a lot of rubber?
Sorry, I'm old school from the days when Honda entered F-1 and James Gardner was in the movie driving it. Even got a print signed by him from the movie.

Anyway, imho, large wheels and ultra low profile tires and style over function and look totally out of place on a Fit.

More rubber is a better ride, more safety, and better real-life handling. And looks lots better too, but that's just this old-phart talking.

John


TOO MUCH TORQUE




Online

699 posts [100%]
11-20-2006
 « « » Reply  Edit


prolly throw off your tach by a little too

TurdBlown Teg




Offline

760 posts [100%]
amherst NY
7-30-2005
 « Re: Bigger wheels/less MPG? (BudgetFitting)« » Reply  Edit


Quote, originally posted by BudgetFitting »

Exactly.

On top of all this, 17" rims don't look good on a Fit.

guess not!



DA Squad #312 only took a few attempts
91 gs integra - totaled
94 ls integra - boosted(not stolen either (yet)) - coming back out in 08 with something sneeky
07 Fit Sport - DD


Wiggums
* B A N N E D *



Offline

41 posts [100%]
5-27-2008
 « Re: Bigger wheels/less MPG? (TurdBlown Teg)« » Reply  Edit


Yeah, 17s look great on a Fit as long as you don't run 55 series sidewalls and don't even drop the car.. then any car can look bad on any wheel

E-AT_me




Offline

2947 posts [100%]
Strasburg VA
9-23-2001
 « Re: Bigger wheels/less MPG? (Wiggums)« » Reply  Edit


yeah, that silver fit looks like ass. whatever. to each there own. i like the 17's on there.



1986 civic Si..

awaiting B16a.


TurdBlown Teg




Offline

760 posts [100%]
amherst NY
7-30-2005
 « Re: Bigger wheels/less MPG? (E-AT_me)« » Reply  Edit


Quote, originally posted by E-AT_me »
yeah, that silver fit looks like ass. whatever. to each there own. i like the 17's on there.

engrish



DA Squad #312 only took a few attempts
91 gs integra - totaled
94 ls integra - boosted(not stolen either (yet)) - coming back out in 08 with something sneeky
07 Fit Sport - DD


RobyWolf




Offline

8 posts [100%]
Walnut CA
7-13-2006
 « Re: Bigger wheels/less MPG? (TurdBlown Teg)« » Reply  Edit


Quote, originally posted by TOO MUCH TORQUE »
prolly throw off your tach by a little too

Not if you use proper plus sizing.

Plus Zero
185/55-15
195/50-15
205/50-15

Plus One
205/45-16
215/40-16

Plus Two
205/40-17

Plus Three
215/35-18



"I came to America with nothing, now I have my own brochure!"

E-AT_me




Offline

2947 posts [100%]
Strasburg VA
9-23-2001
 « Re: Bigger wheels/less MPG? (TurdBlown Teg)« » Reply  Edit


Quote, originally posted by TurdBlown Teg »

engrish

i'm sorry? do you have a problem with the way i type? everything is spelled correctly, just no capitalization.



1986 civic Si..

awaiting B16a.


minijob
(trial)



Offline

1 posts [100%]
Caguas PR
6-7-2008
 « Re: Bigger wheels/less MPG? (E-AT_me)« » Reply  Edit


I use 205/45-16 with light 04 Mini Cooper rims and feel great in curves! Lost about ten miles per half tank only.



Minijob for my Honda Fit

TurdBlown Teg




Offline

760 posts [100%]
amherst NY
7-30-2005
 « Re: Bigger wheels/less MPG? (E-AT_me)« » Reply  Edit


Quote, originally posted by E-AT_me »

i'm sorry? do you have a problem with the way i type? everything is spelled correctly, just no capitalization.

no i just have a problem comprehending what you typed.


IE:
Quote, originally posted by E-AT_me »
yeah, that silver fit looks like ass. whatever. to each there own. i like the 17's on there.

you say it looks like ass; then you say i like the 17's on there... so what is it? you like Real Work emotions on the fit or the fit looks like ass? its one or the other.



DA Squad #312 only took a few attempts
91 gs integra - totaled
94 ls integra - boosted(not stolen either (yet)) - coming back out in 08 with something sneeky
07 Fit Sport - DD


Dudeliness




Offline

37 posts [100%]
Portland OR
9-3-2007
 « Re: Bigger wheels/less MPG? (TurdBlown Teg)« » Reply  Edit


http://www.hotrodders.com/foru....html

It seems like every pound of rotating weight is like ten pounds of weight inside the car, although knowing having a passenger doesn't really affect your mileage, the weight shouldn't affect it much.

If your wheels weigh 20 lbs in total compared to stock wheels, it's just like constantly having a 200 lbs passenger.

The lower profile actually increases mileage due to reduction in flex loss, however a wider tire tread increases rolling resistance.

Heavier wheel DOES affect handling. You have that much more unsprung mass and suspension has to work that much harder to keep the tires in contact with the surface when you encounter small bumps.



E-AT_me




Offline

2947 posts [100%]
Strasburg VA
9-23-2001
 « Re: Bigger wheels/less MPG? (TurdBlown Teg)« » Reply  Edit


Quote, originally posted by TurdBlown Teg »

no i just have a problem comprehending what you typed.


IE:

you say it looks like ass; then you say i like the 17's on there... so what is it? you like Real Work emotions on the fit or the fit looks like ass? its one or the other.

hahahaaa. sorry. no :rolleyes: smiley on here for sarcasm.



1986 civic Si..

awaiting B16a.


TurdBlown Teg




Offline

760 posts [100%]
amherst NY
7-30-2005
 « « » Reply  Edit


i knew thats what your getting at but you know its "tha Intranetz Yo"



DA Squad #312 only took a few attempts
91 gs integra - totaled
94 ls integra - boosted(not stolen either (yet)) - coming back out in 08 with something sneeky
07 Fit Sport - DD


E-AT_me




Offline

2947 posts [100%]
Strasburg VA
9-23-2001
 « Re: (TurdBlown Teg)« » Reply  Edit


word. internet bad-azz numero uNO up in hizzah.



1986 civic Si..

awaiting B16a.


jahdamanga




Offline

17 posts [100%]
3-26-2008
 « Re: Bigger wheels/less MPG? (E-AT_me)« » Reply  Edit


16s would be max or me

stevenmannn




Offline

1915 posts [100%]
Portland OR
6-1-2006
 « Re: Bigger wheels/less MPG? (E-AT_me)« » Reply  Edit


Quote, originally posted by E-AT_me »
yeah, that silver fit looks like ass. whatever. to each THEIR own. i like the 17's on there.

LOL i'm sorry i just had to... but who cares man, put 17's on it. It'll be a small difference in fuel economy i'm sure, but prob not like 10mpg its like driving slightly up a hill, sure its no big deal, but over time theres gonna be some sorta mpg loss.



Quote, originally posted by jameelrose »
yes boost and rhd is dangerous. i crash daily, some times i die. the fact that its a 4 door makes it a little more unsafe.

2008 NHBP GD3

http://www.hondamarketplace.com/zerothread/2344680


hybrid1224




Offline

194 posts [100%]
Tallahassee FL
5-24-2004
 « « » Reply  Edit


Does anyone know the weight of the stock Sport wheels?



..:::MY EK9:::...
...:::Good buyers/Sellers:::...
Throwdown, LudeSH, underpressure02, FAST4DR

I my Honda

   First  1 2 >  Last


» Return to Honda Fit
Forum Jump
Quick Reply

Powered by ZeroForum 2.1.2b. ©2008 RelyNet, Inc.