Which O.E.M. Swaybar kit gets the vote for Good Quality???
01-02-2003, 08:14 PM
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: DALLAS, TX, USA
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Which O.E.M. Swaybar kit gets the vote for Good Quality???
I am in a decision of getting the Beaks or the BSQ Swaybar kit for my 92 eg Hatch. Feel free to express your opinion on either or both of these products if you have expertise in them.
01-03-2003, 12:21 PM
#4
Re: Which O.E.M. Swaybar kit gets the vote for Good Quality??? (jdmillusion)
I personally like the Beaks design best and used it on my hatch. Works great. But don't get me wrong the BSQ kit I hear works just as well at alittle less $$ too.
It was the larger area that the Beaks mounts touches to the subframe...both outside and inside that helped make my desision. I figured it would be extra insurance from subframe yeilding and tearout.
It was the larger area that the Beaks mounts touches to the subframe...both outside and inside that helped make my desision. I figured it would be extra insurance from subframe yeilding and tearout.
01-03-2003, 02:27 PM
#5
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: DALLAS, TX, USA
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Which O.E.M. Swaybar kit gets the vote for Good Quality??? (jdmillusion)
meaning oem fit.
01-03-2003, 04:13 PM
#6
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Which O.E.M. Swaybar kit gets the vote for Good Quality??? (Snake Eyes)
BSQ is cheaper, easier to install and works effectively. IMHO while Beaks kit is also great, I don't see the need to spend more than one has to for this mod...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post