Koni/GC VS AMR Engineering
#1
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pico Rivera, CA
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Koni/GC VS AMR Engineering
I will soon be restoring the suspension on my EK and I came upon these two setups as my top two choices.
Both have high praise
Both offer lifetime warranties
They are similarly priced when you include top hats in the Koni/GCs
GC uses Eibach Springs while AMR uses Hypercoils
In terms of spring rates, my old setup was 500f/300r and it felt pretty good but i was thinking of upping the rears to abut 350r. I am going to be using the car as a daily with some spirited driving when the summer rolls around.
What do you guys suggest?? (I am especially looking for opinions on AMR since there is a thread almost every week about Koni/GCs)
Both have high praise
Both offer lifetime warranties
They are similarly priced when you include top hats in the Koni/GCs
GC uses Eibach Springs while AMR uses Hypercoils
In terms of spring rates, my old setup was 500f/300r and it felt pretty good but i was thinking of upping the rears to abut 350r. I am going to be using the car as a daily with some spirited driving when the summer rolls around.
What do you guys suggest?? (I am especially looking for opinions on AMR since there is a thread almost every week about Koni/GCs)
#2
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sykesville, MD, USA
Posts: 3,032
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Koni/GC VS AMR Engineering
why do you need the top hats? if your considering MR than that means you want something that performs and wont be hella gaydumpt. so there is no need to get the top hats.
that said, can't go wrong either way.
that said, can't go wrong either way.
#3
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pico Rivera, CA
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Koni/GC VS AMR Engineering
Only reason i brought up the top hats is because you get 4 beautifully machined top hats with the AMRs which adds manufacturing and material costs not present with the Koni/GCs, which can make up for the difference in price
#4
Honda-Tech Member
Re: Koni/GC VS AMR Engineering
i'd soften the front and harden the rears. 500/450 is a fun street combo.
as for what you buy? how much money do you have? the AMR's are better and about twice the cost
as for what you buy? how much money do you have? the AMR's are better and about twice the cost
#6
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Nowhere and Everywhere
Posts: 29,530
Likes: 0
Received 52 Likes
on
46 Posts
Re: Koni/GC VS AMR Engineering
AMR's are at least $400-$500 more than a Koni/GC setup. Unless you think you MUST have separate height/preload adjustment, shortened shock bodies, I would get the Koni/GC. Not to mention Koni Sports are essentially infinitely adjustable.
Not knocking AMR at all, they're probably the lowest-priced quality coilover with separate ride height and preload adjustment. Just saying, you really need to weigh the benefits of one vs. the other before spending $500 extra on AMR.
Not knocking AMR at all, they're probably the lowest-priced quality coilover with separate ride height and preload adjustment. Just saying, you really need to weigh the benefits of one vs. the other before spending $500 extra on AMR.
#7
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pico Rivera, CA
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Koni/GC VS AMR Engineering
What? How can they be $500 extra?
Advertised price is 1450. Andy is hooking up HT members with 25% off as seen here:
http://www.hondamarketplace.com/show....php?t=2802185
So AMRs come out to $1160.
Koni/GCs are priced at ~850 + (120*2) for tophats = $1090
(Once again, i am adding the cost of tophats to be fair. The AMRs come with top hats and have a shorter shock body so GC top hats kinda levels the playing field. Alternatively, if i knew the cost of the AMR top hats, i would subtract that from the total cost to compare equal products.)
Advertised price is 1450. Andy is hooking up HT members with 25% off as seen here:
http://www.hondamarketplace.com/show....php?t=2802185
So AMRs come out to $1160.
Koni/GCs are priced at ~850 + (120*2) for tophats = $1090
(Once again, i am adding the cost of tophats to be fair. The AMRs come with top hats and have a shorter shock body so GC top hats kinda levels the playing field. Alternatively, if i knew the cost of the AMR top hats, i would subtract that from the total cost to compare equal products.)
Last edited by xd69; 03-02-2011 at 07:18 PM.
Trending Topics
#9
Re: Koni/GC VS AMR Engineering
I am sure you can PM andy and speak with him about ways to save a couple bucks.
I remember seeing him post some where he said he would use different springs to get the cost down. I belive he uses hypercoil springs.
I remember seeing him post some where he said he would use different springs to get the cost down. I belive he uses hypercoil springs.
#13
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pico Rivera, CA
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Koni/GC VS AMR Engineering
OK now that the price issue is out of the way, can i get some opinions about the AMRs?
So far the only reviews i have found were from people who had just installed them or that were using them to ride slammed.
So far the only reviews i have found were from people who had just installed them or that were using them to ride slammed.
#14
Honda-Tech Member
Re: Koni/GC VS AMR Engineering
https://honda-tech.com/forums/wheels-tires-brakes-suspension-48/%2Alifetime-warranty%2A-amr-engineering-coilovers-24-way-adjustable-custom-applications-more-1659160/
^thread from the release....39 pages of people who ordered and seemed rather satisfied. I know the thread is outdated and its a FS thread but a **** load of people commented after installation who seemed satisfied.
If you really want to get ganger PM one of the guys who purchased and installed and ask them how they've held up over the last years... I personally have heard nothing but good things about AMR.
I've got a friend w/a set on his EG and its on rails, little stiff for my liking but that was his choice.
There's not many times I'd take GC/Koni over another coil but for that price reduction you can't go wrong.
^thread from the release....39 pages of people who ordered and seemed rather satisfied. I know the thread is outdated and its a FS thread but a **** load of people commented after installation who seemed satisfied.
If you really want to get ganger PM one of the guys who purchased and installed and ask them how they've held up over the last years... I personally have heard nothing but good things about AMR.
I've got a friend w/a set on his EG and its on rails, little stiff for my liking but that was his choice.
There's not many times I'd take GC/Koni over another coil but for that price reduction you can't go wrong.
#15
Honda-Tech Member
Re: Koni/GC VS AMR Engineering
what review can you possibly want? opinions? those are almost worthless a lot of times. if the shocks have the ability to control the springs you're using and a smooth dyno plot that's about all you can ask for
#16
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pico Rivera, CA
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Koni/GC VS AMR Engineering
Because of the fact that AMRs have a lifetime warranty, id like to hear how they hold up over time and if the damper shows any sign of wear.
I especially wanna hear from Stock_Sohc_dx as he used to run a Koni/Skunk2 setup and is now rocking AMRs.
I especially wanna hear from Stock_Sohc_dx as he used to run a Koni/Skunk2 setup and is now rocking AMRs.
#18
Honda-Tech Member
Re: Koni/GC VS AMR Engineering
AMR FTW...
Andy is a good guy and makes really nice coilovers.. i have a few friend that have them on their Evo's and they all love them.. one of them is an avid rally cross racer and he had off the shelf AMR's and after 2 years of racing last i heard they were still good!
Andy is a good guy and makes really nice coilovers.. i have a few friend that have them on their Evo's and they all love them.. one of them is an avid rally cross racer and he had off the shelf AMR's and after 2 years of racing last i heard they were still good!
#19
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: on a rock in the middle of the pacific
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Koni/GC VS AMR Engineering
I have both koni/gc ots rates, and amr 550f/450r.
Koni/gc, Ride was ok, felt like the ots rates are way too soft, or dampening wasn't up to par. My ride height was about 1.5 drop all around so I still had good travel. When driving around it sometimes felt like it was bottoming out, harsh like the uca hitting the front towers. I tried setting the shock soft-hard and couldn't quite get rid of the harshness.
For the money they ride ok for someone wanting an entry level setup, as they do handle decently.
Amr 550f/450r same ride height, rides firm/stiff without the bounce you would expect from these rates. They absorb the daily bumps on the way to work just fine and they corner great keeping the car flat. You get a full body coilover with amr, so it can just be installed, and the quality seems good. I just recently got these so longevity I can't vouch for yet, though they have been around for awhile and I have not heard anything bad.
The car these were run on is a del sol, with gsr front sway and no rear sway bar, all other suspension is stock with no tower bars lca braces/bars. The amr suspension is firm enough to the point where imo the car even rattles and squeeks less.
Between the two I'd have to say amr is a great buy for the money. If I had the same spring rates for the koni/gc then I'd really compare them. But this is my experience with these particular setups.
Koni/gc, Ride was ok, felt like the ots rates are way too soft, or dampening wasn't up to par. My ride height was about 1.5 drop all around so I still had good travel. When driving around it sometimes felt like it was bottoming out, harsh like the uca hitting the front towers. I tried setting the shock soft-hard and couldn't quite get rid of the harshness.
For the money they ride ok for someone wanting an entry level setup, as they do handle decently.
Amr 550f/450r same ride height, rides firm/stiff without the bounce you would expect from these rates. They absorb the daily bumps on the way to work just fine and they corner great keeping the car flat. You get a full body coilover with amr, so it can just be installed, and the quality seems good. I just recently got these so longevity I can't vouch for yet, though they have been around for awhile and I have not heard anything bad.
The car these were run on is a del sol, with gsr front sway and no rear sway bar, all other suspension is stock with no tower bars lca braces/bars. The amr suspension is firm enough to the point where imo the car even rattles and squeeks less.
Between the two I'd have to say amr is a great buy for the money. If I had the same spring rates for the koni/gc then I'd really compare them. But this is my experience with these particular setups.
#20
Honda-Tech Member
Re: Koni/GC VS AMR Engineering
*edit*
I forgot to add that after my first set turned out great, I actually ordered a another set for my 2nd car.
#22
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: on a rock in the middle of the pacific
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Koni/GC VS AMR Engineering
I'd like to use 500/400 spring on the koni, but that's probably not going to happen anytime soon unless I could get all 4 springs under 200.
#23
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Nowhere and Everywhere
Posts: 29,530
Likes: 0
Received 52 Likes
on
46 Posts
Re: Koni/GC VS AMR Engineering
I was saying it's not a fair comparison because you can specify spring rates when you order GC's, at no additional charge if I'm not mistaken. I personally wouldn't use GC's OTS "special kit" rates, because like you said they're a bit on the soft side unless you barely lower the car.
#24
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: on a rock in the middle of the pacific
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Koni/GC VS AMR Engineering
I was saying it's not a fair comparison because you can specify spring rates when you order GC's, at no additional charge if I'm not mistaken. I personally wouldn't use GC's OTS "special kit" rates, because like you said they're a bit on the soft side unless you barely lower the car.
#25
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Middle Earth, USA
Posts: 2,056
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Koni/GC VS AMR Engineering
So far my AMRs have been nice, although I need stiffer compression valving at my ride height. My car is pretty slammed though haha. In any case, Andy has taken care of me and he offers a quality coilover. He offers a lifetime warranty, variety of spring rate options, etc.
One downside though is that his lead times can be long at times, but hey he runs a small company, so what do you expect. That's not to say that his customer service lacks though. I've only got positive things to say about my experience with him.
One downside though is that his lead times can be long at times, but hey he runs a small company, so what do you expect. That's not to say that his customer service lacks though. I've only got positive things to say about my experience with him.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1999, 2005, accord, amr, amrenignieeringcom, ca, civic, engineering, extended, hats, honda, konigc, reviews, suspension, top