Notices

Turbo shootout results: BW S256 vs GT3076R

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-08-2008, 11:51 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
 
morgan@synapse motorsport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: upstate, ny
Posts: 2,278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Turbo shootout results: BW S256 vs GT3076R

First we would like to thank Dan(Turbodano here on HT) for allowing us the use of his test unit, without this the comparison never would have happened.

My first thought upon looking at the turbo was that it is definitely larger compared to the GT3076r, and you can see that in the pictures below. The turbine on the s256 is significantly larger than the opposing gt3076r, as is the Exducer on the compressor due to the extended tip technology I gather. The S256's 56mm inducer is 1mm smaller than the 30r’s 57mm inducer. The Borg Warner also comes packaged with a .50 A/R compressor housing vs. the Garrett’s .60 A/R t04e housing, both featured a ported shroud.

Here are some measurements I took of the turbos:

Borg Warner S256:

.50 A/R compressor housing
Compressor Inducer 56.0mm
Compressor Exducer 85.95mm
Turbine 75-76mm (odd number of blades couldn’t put a caliper directly on it just a ballpark figure)

Turbo with .70 A/R 4 bolt housing: 21 lbs
Turbo with .85 A/R 6 bolt housing: 23.2 lbs

Garrett GT3076r

Compressor Inducer 57.0mm
Compressor Exducer 76.14mm
Turbine 59.90mm

Turbo with .63 A/R 4 bolt housing 15.0 lbs
Turbo with Tial .63 A/R v band stainless housing 11.2 lbs

The turbos were tested on my personal motor, here are some of the specs on the motor:

block:
benson sleeved 84mm
earl assembled
9:1 cp pistons
pauter rods
acl bearings
stock crank

head:
applied flow port and polished and built
ferrea 1mm over valves
crower springs/retainers
84mm reshaped combustion chambers to 44cc
5 axis cnc headwork
ITR cams

turbo setup:
garrett gt3076r .82 a/r
garrett core 12x12x3.5 intercooler
2.50" intercooler piping
synapse motorsport front mount manifold
synapse motorsport 3" downpipe
tial 44mm wastegate
tial 50mm bov

stock ignition

other stuff:
victor x IM,
BDL 70mm TB,
competition stage 5 sprung clutch
AEM fuel rail
AEM filter
AEM fpr
walbro 255 stock lines
precision 1000cc injectors
kteller 3" with magnaflow muffler
fluidyne radiator
arp head studs
oem GE 84mm HG

here are a few pictures comparing the size of the two turbochargers.

30r on the left BW on the right.



30r on the left BW on the right.


30r on the left BW on the right.


30r on top BW on the bottom


BW on the left 30r on the right


BW on the left 30r on the right


30r on the left BW on the right.


Here is the BW housing around the 30r turbine wheel you can see the difference in area around the turbine.


few shots of the car on the dyno this morning expect more later.

ryan swapping out the BW for the garrett



Modified by mike@synapse motorsport at 2:47 PM 2/10/2008
Old 02-08-2008, 11:55 AM
  #2  
Honda-Tech Member
 
boosted k20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: new york, n.y., u.s.
Posts: 2,708
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: Turbo shootout results: BW S256 vs GT3076R (mike@synapse motorsport)

in for results
Old 02-08-2008, 12:08 PM
  #3  
Honda-Tech Member
 
B20luda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 816
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Turbo shootout results: BW S256 vs GT3076R (boosted k20)

Cool comparison...Go 30R!! (just cause i have one)
Old 02-08-2008, 12:29 PM
  #4  
Honda-Tech Member
 
fast2camciv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 2,101
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

this should be some interesting fuel for a debate ive been having with some of my nissan friends, in for results!
Old 02-08-2008, 12:39 PM
  #5  
Honda-Tech Member
 
B18Flip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Somewhere in, CT, USA
Posts: 3,910
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Turbo shootout results: BW S256 vs GT3076R (mike@synapse motorsport)

Go 30R! LOL...i have one too Can't wait for the results
Old 02-08-2008, 01:09 PM
  #6  
Thread Starter
 
morgan@synapse motorsport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: upstate, ny
Posts: 2,278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (fast2camciv)

Results are in:

Tests were all done today back to back, there were no changes in the tune whatsoever as both turbos were making the same power at the same boost levels. we used c16 fuel for these dyno runs.

the BW used a .70 a/r turbine housing.
the Garrett used a .82 a/r turbine housing.

dyno comparison at 20psi GT30r is the solid line BW 256 is dotted


green line is boost, blue line is torque


Comparison at 22-23psi GT30r is solid BW is dotted


green line is boost, blue line is torque


both turbos at 24psi dropping off to 23-22psi boost is holding out better on the gt30r but the bw is making a little more power


green line is boost, blue line is torque


in conclusion overall the gt30r consistantly spooled 300-400rpms sooner at each boost level. the borg warner made similar power and at the higher boost levels made slightly more power. either turbo would be a great choice for someone looking to make 450-500+whp. stayed tuned for video footage of the dyno, were still figuring out the software on this new camera windows vista ftl.
Old 02-08-2008, 01:16 PM
  #7  
 
kseitz1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: fairport, ny, us
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Turbo shootout results: BW S256 vs GT3076R (mike@synapse motorsport)

Interested in seeing results. I was thinking of going with the 30r. Would also like to see difference in spool time to.
Old 02-08-2008, 01:16 PM
  #8  
Honda-Tech Member
 
philafelman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: in this nutshell
Posts: 2,657
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (mike@synapse motorsport)

wow, these turbos are very comparable...slightly more power from the borg, but slightly less lag from the garrett. they both seem like very good choices...i dont know if i missed it, but what is the price difference between the two?
Old 02-08-2008, 01:18 PM
  #9  
 
simply's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: northern, NJ, U.S
Posts: 695
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (mike@synapse motorsport)

great info.
Old 02-08-2008, 01:19 PM
  #10  
Man U FTW
 
Schister66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 11,973
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Its good to see results from this finally...now to send both turbos to a BW Distributor for another run...just giving you **** Mike

It would be nice to see a few really high boost runs to see where each turbo chokes off....they should be pretty close, but the BW doesn't seem to come into its element as much until you really push it.

Mike for taking the time to do this
Old 02-08-2008, 01:19 PM
  #11  
 
kseitz1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: fairport, ny, us
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Turbo shootout results: BW S256 vs GT3076R (kseitz1)

WOW! I was writing my post and by the time i finished results were in.
Think ill take the 30r, for the quicker spool on the street.
Old 02-08-2008, 01:23 PM
  #12  
Honda-Tech Member
 
sp00led's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Huntsville, Alabama
Posts: 1,704
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (mike@synapse motorsport)

Great test Mike

Thanks for putting in the work to get these results. These threads are what make honda-tech such a good resource.
Old 02-08-2008, 01:41 PM
  #13  
Honda-Tech Member
 
TDogg Teg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Dinwiddie, VA, USA
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (rota92)

The Garrett's power and torque curves seem to be a little more linear, also.
Old 02-08-2008, 01:43 PM
  #14  
Honda-Tech Member
 
TDogg Teg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Dinwiddie, VA, USA
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (TDogg Teg)

Awesome comparison, nonetheless! I agree with Adam, it would be interesting to see how the two compare at their near or maxed levels.
Old 02-08-2008, 01:44 PM
  #15  
Thread Starter
 
morgan@synapse motorsport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: upstate, ny
Posts: 2,278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (Schister66)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Schister66 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Its good to see results from this finally...now to send both turbos to a BW Distributor for another run...just giving you **** Mike

It would be nice to see a few really high boost runs to see where each turbo chokes off....they should be pretty close, but the BW doesn't seem to come into its element as much until you really push it.

Mike for taking the time to do this </TD></TR></TABLE>

if we have more fuel we would have liked to take both higher but im still running stock lines and a 255.
Old 02-08-2008, 01:54 PM
  #16  
Man U FTW
 
Schister66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 11,973
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default Re: (rota92)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by rota92 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Awesome info guys!

Have Dan send a 258 over to see how much more you can get, and at what price as far as spool time goes </TD></TR></TABLE>

That would probably be a good comparison....the S258 has a more efficient compressor wheel which may add a few ponies to the graph of the S256. Either way, they're fairly evenly matched. My turbo will be a little slower to spool since i have the baller .70ar V-band housing
Old 02-08-2008, 02:09 PM
  #17  
Honda-Tech Member
 
zex_cool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Witness, Protection Program
Posts: 1,074
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Turbo shootout results: BW S256 vs GT3076R (mike@synapse motorsport)

whats the price difference ? and is the BW rebuildable ?
Old 02-08-2008, 02:36 PM
  #18  
Honda-Tech Member
 
B18Flip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Somewhere in, CT, USA
Posts: 3,910
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Turbo shootout results: BW S256 vs GT3076R (rota92)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by rota92 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Pretty much indentical pricing, and the BW is re-buildable

That's the #1 selling point over the GT series right there IMO</TD></TR></TABLE>

plus you don't need water lines...adds up if you're using earls
Old 02-08-2008, 03:18 PM
  #19  
Honda-Tech Member
 
AspectIndustries's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Boost is good
Posts: 3,166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Turbo shootout results: BW S256 vs GT3076R (B18Flip)

Nice. Each has their own high points.

Garrett - Not taller then the BW, which is a plus for tight spaces. + Quicker Spool
BW - Rebuildable

Good stuff.
Old 02-08-2008, 06:21 PM
  #20  
Man U FTW
 
Schister66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 11,973
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default Re: Turbo shootout results: BW S256 vs GT3076R (AspectIndustries)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by AspectIndustries &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Nice. Each has their own high points.

Garrett - Not taller then the BW, which is a plus for tight spaces. + Quicker Spool
BW - Rebuildable

Good stuff. </TD></TR></TABLE>

The .70ar V-band turbine housing is a lot more compact if you're worried about space issues
Old 02-08-2008, 07:01 PM
  #21  
Moderator
iTrader: (14)
 
TheShodan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: City of Wind, IL, USA
Posts: 24,551
Received 234 Likes on 209 Posts
Default Re: Turbo shootout results: BW S256 vs GT3076R (B18Flip)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by B18Flip &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

plus you don't need water lines...adds up if you're using earls</TD></TR></TABLE>

Good tests. We've had plenty on other applications, but not honda..

I LIKE IT!!
Name:  th742185386_l.gif
Views: 3049
Size:  100.6 KB
Old 02-08-2008, 08:27 PM
  #22  
Honda-Tech Member
 
blinx9900's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: poopfacepartytime, ca, usa
Posts: 5,856
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Turbo shootout results: BW S256 vs GT3076R (TheShodan)

thanks for sharing, great thread
Old 02-08-2008, 10:48 PM
  #23  
Honda-Tech Member
 
boosted b5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: albany, ny, usa
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Turbo shootout results: BW S256 vs GT3076R (blinx9900)

finally the test complete. i remember seeing that BW sitting on the counter at the shop.. try to talk Stallmer into a borg warner turbo.. i bet you could.
Old 02-09-2008, 01:35 AM
  #24  
Honda-Tech Member
 
nowtype's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Turbo shootout results: BW S256 vs GT3076R (boosted b5)

GT3076R is a clear winner for anyone looking at performance vs street-ability. A lot more power available while the turbo is spooling. Probably due mainly to the smaller turbine wheel but it shows that Garrett was able to pair a small turbine wheel with a large compressor wheel and make great power. If you are looking for throttle response, the GT30 clearly wins this battle by a lot. Drag racing, the BW unit is a better choice simply because it is less expensive and rebuild-able and in drag racing throttle response isn't really a priority.
Old 02-09-2008, 03:17 AM
  #25  
Honda-Tech Member
 
blinx9900's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: poopfacepartytime, ca, usa
Posts: 5,856
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Turbo shootout results: BW S256 vs GT3076R (nowtype)

perhaps a dumb question but i dont know a damn thing about the BW turbos, the S256 that was tested in this thread, was that a ball bearing turbo?


Quick Reply: Turbo shootout results: BW S256 vs GT3076R



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:42 PM.