Jackson Racing Supercharger for the Fit
11-11-2006, 04:08 PM
#26
Paragraph Alert
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Oil rig, middle of the ocean
Posts: 5,373
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Re: (admiration)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by admiration »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Why is this car getting mad aftermarket support? </TD></TR></TABLE>
Because it's light, cheap, practical and um light.
Because it's light, cheap, practical and um light.
11-15-2006, 06:52 AM
#27
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Villa Park, IL
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Jackson Racing Supercharger for the Fit (FitFanatic)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by FitFanatic »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">The kit is priced. $3500 for 5lbs and $4995 for 10lbs. The Titanium header retails seperately at $1195. It was unveiled at SEMA on Monday. The Jackson Racing Fit was also on display outside in the front. Expect to see kits shortly. Over 125 orders were placed in advance at the show.
[IMG]
[/IMG]
[IMG]
[/IMG]
Thanks Guys!
-Sean </TD></TR></TABLE>
That is alot of freakin money, too much, God damn, I'de better be running 13's with that setup
They should bring the price down, or use the screwer type supercharger like they did witht the K series, this doesn't seem that efficient.
[IMG]
[/IMG][IMG]
[/IMG]Thanks Guys!
-Sean </TD></TR></TABLE>
That is alot of freakin money, too much, God damn, I'de better be running 13's with that setup
They should bring the price down, or use the screwer type supercharger like they did witht the K series, this doesn't seem that efficient.
11-23-2006, 07:13 PM
#29
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: As far south as it gets, Fl
Posts: 1,887
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (AudioCra-Z)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by AudioCra-Z »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Ok, riddle me this. Why would you spend $5k on a kit like this, when you can buy a Type S K20 for around $4500, and spend about a grand (or two) more, and have something that puts out around 200whp? You would still be able to do allot more with a K20 swap. I don't see the advantages with this kit. Am I missing something?</TD></TR></TABLE>
this is the same discussion point that people were making with the d to b series swaps forever ago and today. it boils down to what you wanna do, thats all.
this is the same discussion point that people were making with the d to b series swaps forever ago and today. it boils down to what you wanna do, thats all.
11-24-2006, 06:46 AM
#30
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: columbus, ohio, usa
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the fit is the new CRX. its light, very cheap, and both of those times 4. lol.
im picking my fit up as soon as the dealer gets it in (estimated 50 days).
im picking my fit up as soon as the dealer gets it in (estimated 50 days).
11-24-2006, 12:44 PM
#31
Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: In The 858
Posts: 2,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (743power)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 743power »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">160 to the wheels in a 2400lb car? That should be low-mid 14s if not better</TD></TR></TABLE> 
11-25-2006, 09:56 PM
#33
Honda-Tech Member
Re: Jackson Racing Supercharger for the Fit (huevosrancheros)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by huevosrancheros »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
They should bring the price down, or use the screwer type supercharger like they did witht the K series, this doesn't seem that efficient.</TD></TR></TABLE>
you look at the compressor maps? the rotrex supercharger is a lot more efficient. i wish they made them for the older B series and D series motors.
63hp and 49tq is a huge upgrade in such a little car with a 1.5L engine.
They should bring the price down, or use the screwer type supercharger like they did witht the K series, this doesn't seem that efficient.</TD></TR></TABLE>
you look at the compressor maps? the rotrex supercharger is a lot more efficient. i wish they made them for the older B series and D series motors.
63hp and 49tq is a huge upgrade in such a little car with a 1.5L engine.
12-01-2006, 09:18 AM
#36
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
WHOA like 96wtq AFTER 5lbs of boost? unless this car is VERY light or has amazing gearing its still gonna be a dog.
My car only book 2474lbs, and I'm making 123wtq and 120whp stock, so with that small tq i don't see it doing much better then a 15.2ish.
My car only book 2474lbs, and I'm making 123wtq and 120whp stock, so with that small tq i don't see it doing much better then a 15.2ish.
12-01-2006, 01:46 PM
#37
Honda-Tech Member
Re: (neoSHADOWS)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by neoSHADOWS »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">WHOA like 96wtq AFTER 5lbs of boost? unless this car is VERY light or has amazing gearing its still gonna be a dog.
My car only book 2474lbs, and I'm making 123wtq and 120whp stock, so with that small tq i don't see it doing much better then a 15.2ish.</TD></TR></TABLE>
what graph are you looking at? this thing would smash on your car.
My car only book 2474lbs, and I'm making 123wtq and 120whp stock, so with that small tq i don't see it doing much better then a 15.2ish.</TD></TR></TABLE>
what graph are you looking at? this thing would smash on your car.
12-01-2006, 01:47 PM
#38
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: watching you fap in the bathroom
Posts: 5,172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (STREETWERKZ)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by STREETWERKZ »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">what graph are you looking at? this thing would smash on your car.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
that's the 10psi kit.
</TD></TR></TABLE>that's the 10psi kit.
12-01-2006, 02:04 PM
#39
Honda-Tech Member
Re: (Dacalac)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Dacalac »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
that's the 10psi kit.</TD></TR></TABLE>
where is the 5 psi graph?
i assumed the "STG1" was the 5 psi kit.
the rotrex supercharger shouldnt be used below 10 PSI anyway.
that's the 10psi kit.</TD></TR></TABLE>
where is the 5 psi graph?
i assumed the "STG1" was the 5 psi kit.
the rotrex supercharger shouldnt be used below 10 PSI anyway.
12-01-2006, 02:24 PM
#40
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: watching you fap in the bathroom
Posts: 5,172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (STREETWERKZ)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by STREETWERKZ »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">where is the 5 psi graph?
i assumed the "STG1" was the 5 psi kit.
the rotrex supercharger shouldnt be used below 10 PSI anyway. </TD></TR></TABLE>
the 5psi graph hasn't been brought out yet. Not sure why. I'll keep checking though.
i assumed the "STG1" was the 5 psi kit.
the rotrex supercharger shouldnt be used below 10 PSI anyway. </TD></TR></TABLE>
the 5psi graph hasn't been brought out yet. Not sure why. I'll keep checking though.
12-01-2006, 02:50 PM
#41
Honda-Tech Member
Re: (Dacalac)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Dacalac »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
the 5psi graph hasn't been brought out yet. Not sure why. I'll keep checking though.</TD></TR></TABLE>
so where is that guy getting his figures from?
"96wtq after boost" isnt that what it puts down stock?
the 5psi graph hasn't been brought out yet. Not sure why. I'll keep checking though.</TD></TR></TABLE>
so where is that guy getting his figures from?
"96wtq after boost" isnt that what it puts down stock?
12-01-2006, 02:53 PM
#42
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: watching you fap in the bathroom
Posts: 5,172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (STREETWERKZ)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by STREETWERKZ »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">so where is that guy getting his figures from? </TD></TR></TABLE>
your guess is as good as mine!
your guess is as good as mine!
12-01-2006, 05:21 PM
#44
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (STREETWERKZ)
haha you wish, I made those numbers STOCK. At this point the SC Fit has about 20whp on me, but i have about 40wtq over it, and im not even full bolt-on. let me get a header and catback and then retune my chip ill be in the HP range of the SC Fit and SLAUGHTER it in tq.
Like I said i dont see that car doing better then low 15 in that setup...I'm doing 15.2 now and im not even dyno tuned for what I have done.
Like I said i dont see that car doing better then low 15 in that setup...I'm doing 15.2 now and im not even dyno tuned for what I have done.
12-01-2006, 09:18 PM
#45
Honda-Tech Member
Re: (neoSHADOWS)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by neoSHADOWS »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> At this point the SC Fit has about 20whp on me, but i have about 40wtq over it....................
im not even dyno tuned for what I have done.</TD></TR></TABLE>
so how do you know what sort of power your 15 second ****-us is putting out? troll. 
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by neoSHADOWS »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">haha you wish, I made those numbers STOCK. At this point the SC Fit has about 20whp on me, but i have about 40wtq over it, and im not even full bolt-on. let me get a header and catback and then retune my chip ill be in the HP range of the SC Fit and SLAUGHTER it in tq.
Like I said i dont see that car doing better then low 15 in that setup...I'm doing 15.2 now and im not even dyno tuned for what I have done.</TD></TR></TABLE>
you're talking about a 1.5L honda fit dude. LMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!
100 crank hp stock. you're car is booty.
EDIT: i was calling the ZX2 a focus.... LOL, you drive an escort.
im not even dyno tuned for what I have done.</TD></TR></TABLE>
so how do you know what sort of power your 15 second ****-us is putting out?
troll. <TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by neoSHADOWS »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">haha you wish, I made those numbers STOCK. At this point the SC Fit has about 20whp on me, but i have about 40wtq over it, and im not even full bolt-on. let me get a header and catback and then retune my chip ill be in the HP range of the SC Fit and SLAUGHTER it in tq.
Like I said i dont see that car doing better then low 15 in that setup...I'm doing 15.2 now and im not even dyno tuned for what I have done.</TD></TR></TABLE>
you're talking about a 1.5L honda fit dude. LMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!
100 crank hp stock. you're car is booty.
EDIT: i was calling the ZX2 a focus.... LOL, you drive an escort.
12-01-2006, 10:33 PM
#46
Honda-Tech Member
Re: (STREETWERKZ)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by STREETWERKZ »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
so how do you know what sort of power your 15 second ****-us is putting out? troll.
you're talking about a 1.5L honda fit dude. LMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!
100 crank hp stock. you're car is booty.
EDIT: i was calling the ZX2 a focus.... LOL, you drive an escort. </TD></TR></TABLE>
LOL! But don't stock fits run in the 17s stock ? so your saying with 63hp more its going to be a 13sec. car which is 4 seconds faster. Doesn't seem to add up to me.
so how do you know what sort of power your 15 second ****-us is putting out?
troll. you're talking about a 1.5L honda fit dude. LMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!
100 crank hp stock. you're car is booty.
EDIT: i was calling the ZX2 a focus.... LOL, you drive an escort.
</TD></TR></TABLE>LOL! But don't stock fits run in the 17s stock ? so your saying with 63hp more its going to be a 13sec. car which is 4 seconds faster. Doesn't seem to add up to me.
12-02-2006, 09:06 AM
#47
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (STREETWERKZ)
ok .
1: I miss read the graph and I apologize for that
2. the fact that i run deep 15's can help give a very educated guess of what i'm laying down.
3. the fit is 100 for 1.5 but im 145 from a 2.0
1: I miss read the graph and I apologize for that
2. the fact that i run deep 15's can help give a very educated guess of what i'm laying down.
3. the fit is 100 for 1.5 but im 145 from a 2.0
12-02-2006, 11:06 AM
#48
Honda-Tech Member
Re: (redDAinteg)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by redDAinteg »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
LOL! But don't stock fits run in the 17s stock ? so your saying with 63hp more its going to be a 13sec. car which is 4 seconds faster. Doesn't seem to add up to me. </TD></TR></TABLE>
i never said the fit was going to run any times.
LOL! But don't stock fits run in the 17s stock ? so your saying with 63hp more its going to be a 13sec. car which is 4 seconds faster. Doesn't seem to add up to me. </TD></TR></TABLE>
i never said the fit was going to run any times.
12-02-2006, 11:42 AM
#50
Honda-Tech Member
Re: (redDAinteg)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by redDAinteg »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">but everyone else did in the first page.</TD></TR></TABLE>
i havent agreed on one thing any of these guys have said. LOL
i havent agreed on one thing any of these guys have said. LOL