Jackson Racing Supercharger for the Fit
11-02-2006, 03:04 AM
#1
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: VA
Posts: 568
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Jackson Racing Supercharger for the Fit
http://www.jacksonracing.com/production.htm
http://www.fitfreak.net/forums...age=2
I can't wait until these go to production and find out what the price is going to be. What kind of power and how efficient would something like this be? It looks pretty promising though
Modified by 91dxcrx at 12:38 PM 11/2/2006
http://www.fitfreak.net/forums...age=2
I can't wait until these go to production and find out what the price is going to be. What kind of power and how efficient would something like this be? It looks pretty promising though
Modified by 91dxcrx at 12:38 PM 11/2/2006
11-02-2006, 11:29 AM
#2
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Calimesa, ca, US
Posts: 714
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
they have 2 kits coming out. a 5lb and 10lb kit. The dyno for the 10lb kit is at 158hp to the wheel. I was lucky enough to get a ride in it. The car just pulls and pulls. It feels amazing.
11-03-2006, 03:23 PM
#4
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: CORONA, CA, US
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Jackson Racing Supercharger for the Fit (91dxcrx)
The kit is priced. $3500 for 5lbs and $4995 for 10lbs. The Titanium header retails seperately at $1195. It was unveiled at SEMA on Monday. The Jackson Racing Fit was also on display outside in the front. Expect to see kits shortly. Over 125 orders were placed in advance at the show.
[IMG]
[/IMG]
[IMG]
[/IMG]
Thanks Guys!
-Sean
[IMG]
[/IMG][IMG]
[/IMG]Thanks Guys!
-Sean
Trending Topics
11-06-2006, 03:47 PM
#8
Me Gusta History
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,418
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (hondaless)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by hondaless »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">That would be a fun car to drive around in with the 10lb kit. Wouldn't be that fast but it would be really fun. I would guess low 15 second car.</TD></TR></TABLE>
If it only hit 15's I wouldnt buy the 10 lb. I'd hope for 15's out of the 5 lb. Linear boost ftw.
If it only hit 15's I wouldnt buy the 10 lb. I'd hope for 15's out of the 5 lb. Linear boost ftw.
11-06-2006, 04:19 PM
#9
Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: at the track
Posts: 5,962
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (hondaless)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by hondaless »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">That would be a fun car to drive around in with the 10lb kit. Wouldn't be that fast but it would be really fun. I would guess low 15 second car.</TD></TR></TABLE>
160 to the wheels in a 2400lb car? That should be low-mid 14s if not better
160 to the wheels in a 2400lb car? That should be low-mid 14s if not better
11-06-2006, 06:13 PM
#12
Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: at the track
Posts: 5,962
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (odortiz)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by odortiz »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">looks like a centrifugal charger. am i right? any plans for a twin screw like the one for the b-16?</TD></TR></TABLE>
not exactly, it doesnt use a compressor wheel like a centrifugal, it uses a weird kind of oscilating element inside the housing. It's supposed to have the efficiency of a centrifugal with a really broad powerband and good top end.
http://www.rotrex.com is the site for the maker of the supercharger unit
not exactly, it doesnt use a compressor wheel like a centrifugal, it uses a weird kind of oscilating element inside the housing. It's supposed to have the efficiency of a centrifugal with a really broad powerband and good top end.
http://www.rotrex.com is the site for the maker of the supercharger unit
11-06-2006, 07:14 PM
#13
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Bakersfield, CA, U.S.A
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ok, riddle me this. Why would you spend $5k on a kit like this, when you can buy a Type S K20 for around $4500, and spend about a grand (or two) more, and have something that puts out around 200whp? You would still be able to do allot more with a K20 swap. I don't see the advantages with this kit. Am I missing something?
11-06-2006, 08:50 PM
#14
Me Gusta History
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,418
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (AudioCra-Z)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by AudioCra-Z »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Ok, riddle me this. Why would you spend $5k on a kit like this, when you can buy a Type S K20 for around $4500, and spend about a grand (or two) more, and have something that puts out around 200whp? You would still be able to do allot more with a K20 swap. I don't see the advantages with this kit. Am I missing something?</TD></TR></TABLE>
Better fuel economy plus the feeling of hte car really. It's more 'tossable' and tiny than the RSX which makes it fun like the old CRXs were. That feeling is appealing ot a lot of people.
Plus people 'feel' they can fork out 17 grand for the car and spend 4k on it down the road more feasibly than buy the 21k car outright. Even though it will end up costing the same
Better fuel economy plus the feeling of hte car really. It's more 'tossable' and tiny than the RSX which makes it fun like the old CRXs were. That feeling is appealing ot a lot of people.
Plus people 'feel' they can fork out 17 grand for the car and spend 4k on it down the road more feasibly than buy the 21k car outright. Even though it will end up costing the same
11-06-2006, 11:25 PM
#15
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (AudioCra-Z)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by AudioCra-Z »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Ok, riddle me this. Why would you spend $5k on a kit like this, when you can buy a Type S K20 for around $4500, and spend about a grand (or two) more, and have something that puts out around 200whp? You would still be able to do allot more with a K20 swap. I don't see the advantages with this kit. Am I missing something?</TD></TR></TABLE>
I think because not everyone's interested in going in a straight line and this kit will up the power by a respectable amount w/o compromising the Fit's main strongpoint -- excellent balance and handling.
I think because not everyone's interested in going in a straight line and this kit will up the power by a respectable amount w/o compromising the Fit's main strongpoint -- excellent balance and handling.
11-07-2006, 04:48 PM
#16
Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: at the track
Posts: 5,962
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (AudioCra-Z)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by AudioCra-Z »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Ok, riddle me this. Why would you spend $5k on a kit like this, when you can buy a Type S K20 for around $4500, and spend about a grand (or two) more, and have something that puts out around 200whp? You would still be able to do allot more with a K20 swap. I don't see the advantages with this kit. Am I missing something?</TD></TR></TABLE>
can you confirm that you can put a k20 in a fit for $6500 or less? I don't see that happening for some reason . . .
can you confirm that you can put a k20 in a fit for $6500 or less? I don't see that happening for some reason . . .
11-07-2006, 06:17 PM
#17
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (AudioCra-Z)
Another reason is resale value. It would be easily possible to remove the JR supercharger kit before selling the car. Even if it's still installed, the car would not be as questionable as one with a K-series swap.
At least at this point, I'd trust a good supercharger kit install much more than I'd trust someone cutting and welding the car's unibody to install a K-series engine. That may change if someone makes good K-series mount kits, but it doesn't change the fact that a car with an engine swap appeals to a very limited audience.
At least at this point, I'd trust a good supercharger kit install much more than I'd trust someone cutting and welding the car's unibody to install a K-series engine. That may change if someone makes good K-series mount kits, but it doesn't change the fact that a car with an engine swap appeals to a very limited audience.
11-08-2006, 04:40 PM
#18
Paragraph Alert
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Oil rig, middle of the ocean
Posts: 5,373
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Re: (743power)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 743power »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">160 to the wheels in a 2400lb car? That should be low-mid 14s if not better</TD></TR></TABLE>
No joke. In fact 13's should be no problem with decent tires.
No joke. In fact 13's should be no problem with decent tires.
11-09-2006, 01:20 PM
#21
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Sherman Oaks, CA, United States
Posts: 7,539
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Re: (Dacalac)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Dacalac »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">dyno sheet:
</TD></TR></TABLE>
That torque curve isn't nearly as linear as the older B series kits. Really, it almost looks like a turbo dyno.
However, I imagine 4k to 6k feels absolutely fantastic.
</TD></TR></TABLE>That torque curve isn't nearly as linear as the older B series kits. Really, it almost looks like a turbo dyno.
However, I imagine 4k to 6k feels absolutely fantastic.
11-09-2006, 01:57 PM
#22
Re: (accordselux)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by accordselux »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Better fuel economy plus the feeling of hte car really. It's more 'tossable' and tiny than the RSX which makes it fun like the old CRXs were. That feeling is appealing ot a lot of people. </TD></TR></TABLE>
This is what makes me enjoy driving the Fit so much. It feels like a CRX that's MUCH safer and has a lot more room.
Better fuel economy plus the feeling of hte car really. It's more 'tossable' and tiny than the RSX which makes it fun like the old CRXs were. That feeling is appealing ot a lot of people. </TD></TR></TABLE>
This is what makes me enjoy driving the Fit so much. It feels like a CRX that's MUCH safer and has a lot more room.
11-09-2006, 02:54 PM
#23
Paragraph Alert
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Oil rig, middle of the ocean
Posts: 5,373
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Re: (TunerN00b)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by TunerN00b »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">That torque curve isn't nearly as linear as the older B series kits. Really, it almost looks like a turbo dyno.
However, I imagine 4k to 6k feels absolutely fantastic.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Actually the torque curve is pretty linear just not flat. Yes a nice flat torque curve would be awesome but at least this kit produces power that comes on in a predictable manner with no sudden spikes or dips. Also of note is not only does it make more power period it also appears to hold onto it's torque for about 500rpms longer before dropping off. If you look at the stock graph torque starts falling off at around 5,000rpms. With the supercharger it doesn't start running out of breath until around 5,600pms. Than in itself can make a pretty big difference.
However, I imagine 4k to 6k feels absolutely fantastic.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Actually the torque curve is pretty linear just not flat. Yes a nice flat torque curve would be awesome but at least this kit produces power that comes on in a predictable manner with no sudden spikes or dips. Also of note is not only does it make more power period it also appears to hold onto it's torque for about 500rpms longer before dropping off. If you look at the stock graph torque starts falling off at around 5,000rpms. With the supercharger it doesn't start running out of breath until around 5,600pms. Than in itself can make a pretty big difference.
