2000 civic Si(R) fuel economy
#26
Cool Cool Island Breezes. BOY-EE
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: TRILLINOIS....WAY downtown, jerky.
Posts: 11,953
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Re: 2000 civic Si(R) fuel economy
People's definition of city vs. highway is disputed vehemently. Suburban driving is a mix of city STYLE and highway STYLE driving. Your commute at a 30mph average doesn't take you anywhere near a traffic jam....just like it doesn't take you anywhere near a highway.
City and highway are types of driving conditions. Not related to geography. A person driving through Chicago at 1AM on a weekday will get better MPG than someone driving through the middle of nowhere and hitting a freak traffic jam.
A good way to equate this is your average MPH. EPA estimates won't consider a 30mph drive to be "city" miles.
Your MPG is lower than one would expect. But expectations and results will vary for each individual factor. You can still average 30mph and get "city" gas mileage. But its not common...and will likely have more to do with driving habits or environmental factors that are unique.
Your P0420 may be some sort of indicator also.
Maybe your catalyst failed because of some crazy stuff they put in Canadian fuels? Or maybe the car is habitually running rich due to a failed component and is killing the cat.
Or the cat is broken apart and is blocking exhaust flow.
City and highway are types of driving conditions. Not related to geography. A person driving through Chicago at 1AM on a weekday will get better MPG than someone driving through the middle of nowhere and hitting a freak traffic jam.
A good way to equate this is your average MPH. EPA estimates won't consider a 30mph drive to be "city" miles.
Your MPG is lower than one would expect. But expectations and results will vary for each individual factor. You can still average 30mph and get "city" gas mileage. But its not common...and will likely have more to do with driving habits or environmental factors that are unique.
Your P0420 may be some sort of indicator also.
Maybe your catalyst failed because of some crazy stuff they put in Canadian fuels? Or maybe the car is habitually running rich due to a failed component and is killing the cat.
Or the cat is broken apart and is blocking exhaust flow.
#27
Honda-Tech Member
Re: 2000 civic Si(R) fuel economy
I have an em1. Currently the cat and o2 sensors are busted with cels. Car hasn't had a tune up in years and I routinely get about 330-340 to a full tank, I drive with a heavy foot and put the car in vtec often. Just putting in my 2cents for more comparisons from the same car and engine.
#30
Re: 2000 civic Si(R) fuel economy
Your P0420 may be some sort of indicator also.
Maybe your catalyst failed because of some crazy stuff they put in Canadian fuels? Or maybe the car is habitually running rich due to a failed component and is killing the cat.
This is what I want to know, what components would cause the engine to run rich? I do not want to be out a cat if there's an underlying problem that's causing it.
As far as gas is concerned were getting the same fuel that you guys south of us are getting (probably higher quality because ***** hella more expensive)
Maybe your catalyst failed because of some crazy stuff they put in Canadian fuels? Or maybe the car is habitually running rich due to a failed component and is killing the cat.
This is what I want to know, what components would cause the engine to run rich? I do not want to be out a cat if there's an underlying problem that's causing it.
As far as gas is concerned were getting the same fuel that you guys south of us are getting (probably higher quality because ***** hella more expensive)
#31
Cool Cool Island Breezes. BOY-EE
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: TRILLINOIS....WAY downtown, jerky.
Posts: 11,953
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Re: 2000 civic Si(R) fuel economy
EM1's had an issue with the ECU being too sensitive and setting a CEL for catalyst efficiency. Mine would turn off if I drove the car at 100mph+ for long periods of time. Then would turn back on later.
If it is actually running rich....your FPR diaphragm could be torn. Leaky injector maybe. I had another EM1 that had a clogged MAP port so it always read low vacuum. Could be a lazy TPS.
What spark plugs are you using? What did your old plugs look like?
If it is actually running rich....your FPR diaphragm could be torn. Leaky injector maybe. I had another EM1 that had a clogged MAP port so it always read low vacuum. Could be a lazy TPS.
What spark plugs are you using? What did your old plugs look like?
#33
Re: 2000 civic Si(R) fuel economy
EM1's had an issue with the ECU being too sensitive and setting a CEL for catalyst efficiency. Mine would turn off if I drove the car at 100mph+ for long periods of time. Then would turn back on later.
If it is actually running rich....your FPR diaphragm could be torn. Leaky injector maybe. I had another EM1 that had a clogged MAP port so it always read low vacuum. Could be a lazy TPS.
What spark plugs are you using? What did your old plugs look like?
If it is actually running rich....your FPR diaphragm could be torn. Leaky injector maybe. I had another EM1 that had a clogged MAP port so it always read low vacuum. Could be a lazy TPS.
What spark plugs are you using? What did your old plugs look like?
Haven't timed the warm up times but 2-3 minutes usually is when the temperature begins climbing up.
#34
Cool Cool Island Breezes. BOY-EE
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: TRILLINOIS....WAY downtown, jerky.
Posts: 11,953
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Re: 2000 civic Si(R) fuel economy
Hmm. Plugs weren't covered in black soot? That kind of indicates that it probably isn't running too rich.
Could your catalyst be broken? Heard any rattles?
Could your catalyst be broken? Heard any rattles?
#35
Re: 2000 civic Si(R) fuel economy
There weren't any obvious signs of a bad sparkplug other then white residue on one of the sparkplugs.
The cat at idle I don't hear anything wrong or out of the ordinary, but I know for sure something is wrong because even after CEL resets, if I ever go on the highway it comes back on, happened at least 3 times.
#38
Re: 2000 civic Si(R) fuel economy
Actually I've accounted for that, I tried not changing my habits, maintaining consistent driving behaviours that I outline before (3500 rpm shifts, no harsh acceleration etc), nothings changed in my driving habit or route aside from the increased mileage, but I'll keep an eye out on the next few fill ups to get the average.
#39
Cool Cool Island Breezes. BOY-EE
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: TRILLINOIS....WAY downtown, jerky.
Posts: 11,953
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Re: 2000 civic Si(R) fuel economy
Try different things to see if the mileage improves or worsens further. You're too worried about setting a habit at this point. Just shift whenever it feels good to shift. I don't observe too much...but unless I'm driving my TSX or ITR with their big elephant sized engines...I don't think I ever shift at 3500RPM when accelrating. I found better MPG by just shifting by feel for each situation rather than setting a specific shift point.
#40
Cool Cool Island Breezes. BOY-EE
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: TRILLINOIS....WAY downtown, jerky.
Posts: 11,953
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Re: 2000 civic Si(R) fuel economy
~26mpg for a 30 mile round trip commute at a 30mph average is pretty much the most normal **** that's ever been recorded, though. You're in the majority region.
But hey...keep altering your driving habits. Maybe you can improve it, if you are so inclined.
But hey...keep altering your driving habits. Maybe you can improve it, if you are so inclined.
#43
Re: 2000 civic Si(R) fuel economy
Try different things to see if the mileage improves or worsens further. You're too worried about setting a habit at this point. Just shift whenever it feels good to shift. I don't observe too much...but unless I'm driving my TSX or ITR with their big elephant sized engines...I don't think I ever shift at 3500RPM when accelrating. I found better MPG by just shifting by feel for each situation rather than setting a specific shift point.
Well yeah, sorry if it's not clear but I don't shift on straight up 3500 but I do get a feel for the shift and generally it's always around 3500 give or take a few hundred rpms due to hills and traffic which is why I set that as my base.
#44
#46
#48
#49
Cool Cool Island Breezes. BOY-EE
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: TRILLINOIS....WAY downtown, jerky.
Posts: 11,953
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Re: 2000 civic Si(R) fuel economy
I don't use it unless I'm out on the an open highway or coming home late AF to/from the burbs. I've held off on getting an aftermarket steering wheel because I love my CC...and am too lazy to re-locate the buttons.
#50
Re: 2000 civic Si(R) fuel economy
yeah thats the problem, there ain't no open highway where I live unless I'm south of the border which is very seldom, only a **** ton of choke points scattered all across the metro area