kasimmmmm

Hey guys, whats the lowest offset we can fit or you have seen on 7thgens?
7.5 wide wheel.

Boilermaker1

What are you trying to do?
I'd say you can get away with 35 and keep it in the fenders

<StevieG>

i got a 7inch wheel and i'm running 28 and i'm about flush with the wheel wheel

toyomatt84

iTrader: (1)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Boilermaker1 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">What are you trying to do?
I'd say you can get away with 35 and keep it in the fenders</TD></TR></TABLE>

Not if he's lowered. I've got 195/55/16's on my 16x7 +35 Work Ewing RS-Beta's, and even with 1.5 degrees of camber, I rub on bumps.

PS. 16x7.5 +35's would stick out about 6.8mm more than 16x7 +35, meaning even less clearance.

Boilermaker1

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by toyomatt84 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Not if he's lowered. I've got 195/55/16's on my 16x7 +35 Work Ewing RS-Beta's, and even with 1.5 degrees of camber, I rub on bumps.

PS. 16x7.5 +35's would stick out about 6.8mm more than 16x7 +35, meaning even less clearance.</TD></TR></TABLE>

Not that I'm questioning it... but 16x8 +38 (thats hanging out further than a 35 7.5), 225/45/16s and I dont rub on anything. Roll the fenders or play with it.
At some point on 7th gen I wrote a "Standard answer" to this question.... the cliff notes is try it and fiddle around until it works.

toyomatt84

iTrader: (1)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Boilermaker1 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

Not that I'm questioning it... but 16x8 +38 (thats hanging out further than a 35 7.5), 225/45/16s and I dont rub on anything. Roll the fenders or play with it.
At some point on 7th gen I wrote a "Standard answer" to this question.... the cliff notes is try it and fiddle around until it works.</TD></TR></TABLE>

Have you had your tires tuck under the fenders? I've seen your car on multiple accounts, and I want to say that you haven't (at least not while sitting still).

Boilermaker1

Not standing still.... but put that thing on the track, it squats down pretty good. My car's not dumped, but there's only a finger-finger and a half of clearance in there... I drove the car 1500 miles over the summer with an extra set of rims, my tools and my camping gear in it for a track day in Michigan, I never had a problem rubbing on anything, and you can be pretty certain that all that **** in the back cleared out that wheel gap in a hurry.
Like I said... I'm not disagreeing with you.... but, if you want it to happen, there's ways of making it happen. I'm sure the VW style stretchytire would get the job done too.... those guys do some crazy **** and still clear factory fenders.

burke420

i got the 17x7 +35 offset and i dont rub at all.. but my rear fenders were trimmed off by a shop and no rubbing period... i wish i got a lower offset!

Tu MaDre

I wish I could tuck a 7.5

tunerkid7

i wish i had smaller tires

Hondakorn

feriohhhh had 16x7.5 +19 sprint cpr's

toyomatt84

iTrader: (1)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Hondakorn &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">feriohhhh had 16x7.5 +19 sprint cpr's</TD></TR></TABLE>

And about 3.5 degrees of negative camber.

kasimmmmm

wow 3.5 degrees - camber is insane... is that with rolled fenders?

where can I find pics of his car?

fventura03

iTrader: (1)

lowest i'd do is 16x7.5 +35 if you want the flush look.

here iz dem pix j00 waz asken bout

oddmut

damn that's too much camber for me.

burke420

holy crap..2000 miles is all id expect out them tires...omg! bu that car is sooo friggin clean!

feri0hhh

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Hondakorn &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">feriohhhh had 16x7.5 +19 sprint cpr's</TD></TR></TABLE>

16x7.. wheels are sold now tho.

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by toyomatt84 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

And about 3.5 degrees of negative camber.</TD></TR></TABLE>

camber was crazy but i did not have to go so much, i wanted to tuck these thats why i went so much.


with that size and offset, my front sits flush.. my rear could be flushed with out as much camber, but i like my car low

heres a pic of the front


heres 16x7 +33 fr 16x8 +38 rr, if this helps


personally, all the different size and offset i've tried, with minimal camber, tucked, and not sucked in, for a x7.5, i'd go with something close to 40 offset.. but if you dont mind a little negative camber, id mess with some 30-35.. they just sit so much nicer.


17x7.5 +40



Modified by feri0hhh at 2:47 PM 12/21/2007

toyomatt84

iTrader: (1)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by feri0hhh &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
heres 16x7 +33 fr 16x8 +38 rr, if this helps
</TD></TR></TABLE>

If I'm honest, those are the ones I liked best on your car.

03EM2guy

feri0hhh i LOVE the way ur car sits SO SEXY

one of the cleanest out there

Newborn_

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 03EM2guy &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">feri0hhh i LOVE the way ur car sits SO SEXY

one of the cleanest out there </TD></TR></TABLE>

Agreed, i love this shot

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by feri0hhh &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> 17x7.5 +40
</TD></TR></TABLE>

feri0hhh

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by toyomatt84 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

If I'm honest, those are the ones I liked best on your car. </TD></TR></TABLE>

thanks i liked those too, but sold it to put more into my project car.. this is my dd so i dont want to do too much to it


<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Yoshimi_Vs. &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

Agreed, i love this shot

</TD></TR></TABLE>

thanks

turbocharge916r

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by feri0hhh &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

16x7.. wheels are sold now tho.

camber was crazy but i did not have to go so much, i wanted to tuck these thats why i went so much.


with that size and offset, my front sits flush.. my rear could be flushed with out as much camber, but i like my car low

heres a pic of the front


heres 16x7 +33 fr 16x8 +38 rr, if this helps


personally, all the different size and offset i've tried, with minimal camber, tucked, and not sucked in, for a x7.5, i'd go with something close to 40 offset.. but if you dont mind a little negative camber, id mess with some 30-35.. they just sit so much nicer.


17x7.5 +40



Modified by feri0hhh at 2:47 PM 12/21/2007</TD></TR></TABLE>

dang feri0hhh i love your car... it hella tight.. i wish i have car like yours.. your car hella sexy... i give you hella props yo.. ill buy your car if i have money..

JamesL

SE37s on a 7th gen?

I love it!

Mr.OB*GYN_Rhett

iTrader: (2)

that white 4door is killing it

kasimmmmm

great info guys... thank you