Notices

Best year ('88-'91) for the EF and CRX

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-24-2001, 08:08 AM
  #1  
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
 
Black R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Atlantis
Posts: 12,948
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default Best year ('88-'91) for the EF and CRX


Ok guys,

I'm thinking about getting another 4th gen hatch or a crx.

Which years are best? Please limit your suggestions to the years '88-'91.

Eventually it will get a transplant (b18), but for now will be a daily driver/ beater.

What year(s) are the lightest, etc? I've seen a web page that shows the earlier years of the crx's were lighter: example - '88 hf was the lightest...

I'm also interested in how suspension upgrades might work on earlier/ later year models...

For example, I've heard that the '88 hf had a trailing arm similar to the type R... Any little quirks which I should be thinking about? Structural rigidity, upgradeability, etc...

Thanks!
Old 04-24-2001, 08:36 AM
  #2  
New User
 
EVOCELICA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Los Angeles, Ca, USA
Posts: 2,114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Best year ('88-'91) for the EF and CRX (Black R)

I PERSONALLY WOULD GET A 91 CRX, DON'T THEY COME WITH REAR DISK BRAKES????

HTTP:\\WWW.TEAM-EVOLUTION.NET
Old 04-24-2001, 09:17 AM
  #3  
Honda-Tech Member
 
o-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: living too close to Karl, everythings busted, nc
Posts: 750
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Best year ('88-'91) for the EF and CRX (Black R)

The 88 CRX HF is probably the lightest of the bunch. Depending on what swap/ brake upgrades you are looking to do, I would look at a DX or Si. All 88 cars have lower control arms similar to the Type-R, Makes them tailhappy at the limit due to passive toe-out. The 90-91 CRX Si have rear disks and to my limited knowledge, bigger front brakes. I hope this helps
Old 04-24-2001, 09:35 AM
  #4  
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
 
Black R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Atlantis
Posts: 12,948
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default Good points!


Yeah, I was looking at '91 my because I figure all the bugs will have been worked out by then... But the $ is higher, and they seem to be heavier than previous years. This car will be a sleeper, so nice interior is a plus, but I dunno... I'll replace the engine soon anyway, so maybe the older cars are better...

Old 04-24-2001, 12:26 PM
  #5  
Member
 
rioninja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 3,331
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: Good points! (Black R)

The 88 (possibly 89) CRXs have lighter doors than the later models. The seatbelts on the newer ones are built into the door, where on the earlier ones they mount to the roof above the frame.
Old 04-24-2001, 07:20 PM
  #6  
Honda-Tech Member
 
xtrafastcivic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,482
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: Good points! (RioNinja)

not roof b pillar get a 88 if you can find a hf that's tiite took me 6 months if not buy the si one still lighter then all of the other dx and si's the only bad thing that i thought was kyb doesn't make rear shocks for the 88 years doesn't matter now since i got gab revo stroke 2's!! so 88
Old 04-25-2001, 05:59 PM
  #7  
Trial User
 
Jesse H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Sugar Land, TX, USA
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Good points! (XtraFastCRX)

88 HF hands down.

no sunroof to leak or add weight. Makes it a lil bit firmer, that generation civic/crx have flimsy chassis. THe DX makes the wiring a little bit more difficult when it comes to swaps, but no biggie.

under 2000lbs w/out driver, can't beat that. 90's and 91's are freaking heavy...at least 200lbs.
Old 04-25-2001, 06:41 PM
  #8  
Junior Member
 
WONG FRIED RICE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: BAY AREA, ca, usa
Posts: 648
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Best year ('88-'91) for the EF and CRX (Black R)

i have a 88' CRX Hybrid Si...B16A as you can see...i'm pretty happy with what i have. Honestly think that this one is pretty good...if i'm not mistaken the suspension is better than the HF version...double wishbone, like the Type R. The HF is light..but not by much.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
OoThomioO
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
49
07-15-2010 08:25 AM
jimmy o.
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
9
08-04-2009 10:29 AM
Subterraneous
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
9
08-23-2006 02:57 PM
Import Al
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
20
12-31-2004 05:42 PM
Sr20 B12
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
11
07-23-2001 01:29 PM



Quick Reply: Best year ('88-'91) for the EF and CRX



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:54 PM.