Fuel economy problems 96 HX
#1
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Fuel economy problems 96 HX
I have been working on a 96 Civic HX and cannot seem to increase the fuel economy. I have replaced the following and they are new parts that were tested to make sure they're good.
Replaced the following:
Fuel injectors and fuel pressure regulator
EGR valve, passages/plenum also cleaned out, intake manifold cleaned
VTEC spool valve replaced
Distributor (set to 12 degrees with service connector attached)
Spark plugs and wires, both gapped and tested to specs (plugs correct heat range)
new timing belt
new exhaust
valve adjustment
new alternator, battery and engine grounds
drive belts adjusted to proper tension
wheel alignment done, with tie rod (front) and toe adjusters (Rear) replaced. All specs for the wheel alignment look good.
Battery disconnected, reconnected for idle relearn procedure
Both 02 sensors replaced, wideband on D16Y5 Engine, correct brand, denso and NTK.
With all these things replaced the mpgs would go up slightly only to fall again. I've gone up to a high of 31 to fall back to 28.
I even went as far as trying ethanol free gas but that actually caused the mpgs to fall! I was down to 26mpg with ethanol free gas. Any help is appreciated as I am frustrated I can't get this back to what it used to be with 36-37 city and 41+ mpg hwy.
EDIT: To update I did forget to put down I replaced the 02 sensors, updated list..
Replaced the following:
Fuel injectors and fuel pressure regulator
EGR valve, passages/plenum also cleaned out, intake manifold cleaned
VTEC spool valve replaced
Distributor (set to 12 degrees with service connector attached)
Spark plugs and wires, both gapped and tested to specs (plugs correct heat range)
new timing belt
new exhaust
valve adjustment
new alternator, battery and engine grounds
drive belts adjusted to proper tension
wheel alignment done, with tie rod (front) and toe adjusters (Rear) replaced. All specs for the wheel alignment look good.
Battery disconnected, reconnected for idle relearn procedure
Both 02 sensors replaced, wideband on D16Y5 Engine, correct brand, denso and NTK.
With all these things replaced the mpgs would go up slightly only to fall again. I've gone up to a high of 31 to fall back to 28.
I even went as far as trying ethanol free gas but that actually caused the mpgs to fall! I was down to 26mpg with ethanol free gas. Any help is appreciated as I am frustrated I can't get this back to what it used to be with 36-37 city and 41+ mpg hwy.
EDIT: To update I did forget to put down I replaced the 02 sensors, updated list..
Last edited by oneheadlight; 10-14-2014 at 01:45 PM.
#3
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Fuel economy problems 96 HX
[QUOTE=oneheadlight;50003026]Replaced the following:
Fuel injectors and fuel pressure regulator
EGR valve, passages/plenum also cleaned out, intake manifold cleaned
VTEC spool valve
Distributor (set to 12 degrees with service connector attached)
Spark plugs and wires, both gapped and tested to specs (plugs correct heat range)
new timing belt
new exhaust
valve adjustment
new alternator, battery and engine grounds
drive belts adjusted to proper tension
wheel alignment done, with tie rod (front) and toe adjusters (Rear) replaced. All specs for the wheel alignment look good.
Battery disconnected, reconnected for idle relearn procedure
QUOTE]
I almost everything, minus, stock air box filter change?
Fuel injectors and fuel pressure regulator
EGR valve, passages/plenum also cleaned out, intake manifold cleaned
VTEC spool valve
Distributor (set to 12 degrees with service connector attached)
Spark plugs and wires, both gapped and tested to specs (plugs correct heat range)
new timing belt
new exhaust
valve adjustment
new alternator, battery and engine grounds
drive belts adjusted to proper tension
wheel alignment done, with tie rod (front) and toe adjusters (Rear) replaced. All specs for the wheel alignment look good.
Battery disconnected, reconnected for idle relearn procedure
QUOTE]
I almost everything, minus, stock air box filter change?
#6
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Re: Fuel economy problems 96 HX
That huge list yet you haven't touched your O2 sensors?
Usually an old clogged up O2 sensor (primary) is one of the main causes for poor mileage.
The other thing that comes to mind, isn't the HX the D16Y5 vtec-e motor?
If it is, I would be wondering about vtec-e operation, the solenoid has been known to get fouled and not work. No 12 valve operation would put you into the normal D16Y7 mpg operation range.
Usually an old clogged up O2 sensor (primary) is one of the main causes for poor mileage.
The other thing that comes to mind, isn't the HX the D16Y5 vtec-e motor?
If it is, I would be wondering about vtec-e operation, the solenoid has been known to get fouled and not work. No 12 valve operation would put you into the normal D16Y7 mpg operation range.
The VTEC spool solenoid was also replaced, since the original wasn't testing correctly.
#7
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Trending Topics
#8
Re: Fuel economy problems 96 HX
Any CEL codes? Just curious, CVT or manual?
Brand new entire distributor? Brand new plug wires and spark plugs?
Have you compression tested the cylinders?
Brand new entire distributor? Brand new plug wires and spark plugs?
Have you compression tested the cylinders?
#9
Honda-Tech Member
Re: Fuel economy problems 96 HX
All the money you spent on all of these parts would had gotten you plenty of tanks of fuel ha. What's the spec for your vehicles' mpg? How far off is it?
#10
Honda-Tech Member
Re: Fuel economy problems 96 HX
Just curious but have you done a cold/hot compression test? How about a fuel pressure test? Are your injectors spraying evenly? Leaking? Also how are you figuring out your mpg?
#11
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Fuel economy problems 96 HX
TomCat the default mode for the D16Y5 is 12V. The VTEC solenoid activates the 2nd intake valve ~3000 rpm depending on load.
Do a compression test. You can have all new parts but if your combustion is not efficient it won't matter. Does the car use oil between changes?
Do a compression test. You can have all new parts but if your combustion is not efficient it won't matter. Does the car use oil between changes?
#12
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Re: Fuel economy problems 96 HX
ron- no cel codes, had one earlier but that was for the idle air control valve, replaced it, fixed that problem.
it's a manual, the distributor is brand new but not a Honda, since Honda doesn't make the Hitachi distributor for the HX, been discontinued. I've tested the three sensors for the distributor (resistance tests) and they are close to spec, hey can't complain when it's the only distributor that actually was close to spec. The others from china were way off in spec, I returned those. The plug wires and plugs are new. I've tested the wires, very low in resistance (NGK plug wires), and NGK spark plugs. The plugs are the correct heat range and gap.
I haven't compression tested the engine, but what is odd about all this is that I'll have a part go bad, mpg's go down, I replace that bad part, the mpg's go back up, then drift back down. very odd
I had said earlier, but it's ok I'll repeat, I had tried ethanol free gas and that made the mpg's go from 31 down to 26! Here I thought ethanol free gas was supposed to give really good mpgs.
#13
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Re: Fuel economy problems 96 HX
The injectors are remanufactured by GB Remanufacturing and are not leaking, and appear to be spraying correctly. The fuel pressure regulator was leaking, has since been repaired, no leaks.
MPG calculation the standard way. Start odometer once fuel is topped off (fuel nozzle clicks off due to vapor in tank build up), let odometer run until next fill up. Mileage divided by gallons pumps (At click off).
#14
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Re: Fuel economy problems 96 HX
The problem is replace a bad part, mpg's go up initially, then drift back down. Very odd. If it was compression being bad, how could mpg's go up at all? It shouldn't be able to do that.
The engine is a brand new replacement engine put in back in 04, so it only has about 80,000 miles on it. I know that doesn't make a difference but thought that would be early to have any issues with compression, as it hasn't had any other owners than my family. (not abused, etc..)
#15
Re: Fuel economy problems 96 HX
what is odd about all this is that I'll have a part go bad, mpg's go down, I replace that bad part, the mpg's go back up, then drift back down. very odd
I had said earlier, but it's ok I'll repeat, I had tried ethanol free gas and that made the mpg's go from 31 down to 26! Here I thought ethanol free gas was supposed to give really good mpgs.
I had said earlier, but it's ok I'll repeat, I had tried ethanol free gas and that made the mpg's go from 31 down to 26! Here I thought ethanol free gas was supposed to give really good mpgs.
#16
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Re: Fuel economy problems 96 HX
What about ethanol free gas? here I thought that it was the holy grail and would improve mpg's, didn't happen here, it actually dropped 5 mpg using it.
#17
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Re: Fuel economy problems 96 HX
Do the 96-00 civic have the same 7.5A backup fuse for ECU reset?
I know anytime you mod the car (new intake, new exhaust headers etc) you are supposed to do the ecu reset (pull the 7.5A backup fuse for 20-30 seconds) and let the ECU" relearn the base map tweaks.
The same is probably a good idea with replacing bad parts as it has adjusted to the bad parts and it will take it many weeks to learn the new parts.
I am not sure if pulling the battery cable is the equivalent as pulling the back up fuse under the hood.
And thanks for enlightening me on the vtec-e operation cbaber, I should have known that, but my mind just didn't fully wrap around the low lobe operation like it did for the performance high lobe. It makes total sense it would operate on the smallest sized lobe by default and solenoid engages a larger lobe (16 valve).
I know anytime you mod the car (new intake, new exhaust headers etc) you are supposed to do the ecu reset (pull the 7.5A backup fuse for 20-30 seconds) and let the ECU" relearn the base map tweaks.
The same is probably a good idea with replacing bad parts as it has adjusted to the bad parts and it will take it many weeks to learn the new parts.
I am not sure if pulling the battery cable is the equivalent as pulling the back up fuse under the hood.
And thanks for enlightening me on the vtec-e operation cbaber, I should have known that, but my mind just didn't fully wrap around the low lobe operation like it did for the performance high lobe. It makes total sense it would operate on the smallest sized lobe by default and solenoid engages a larger lobe (16 valve).
#18
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Re: Fuel economy problems 96 HX
I'm saying I don't know if it can. It's why I was putting it out for someone like RonJ to clarify on. I know he's pretty intimate with the electricals and would know if it has a capacitor to make a long term RC time constant. It would make sense to have it by design so that every single time the battery is pulled it's not relearning the "qwirks" of the vehicle again. But doesn't mean it's there. *shrug*
but I do thank you for all your input!!
#19
Re: Fuel economy problems 96 HX
Pulling the Back Up fuse or disconnecting the battery will reset the ECU.
I asked you about resetting the ECU because years ago a member documented clearly that resetting the ECU on I think a 94 Civic led to temporarily higher gas mileage.
I asked you about resetting the ECU because years ago a member documented clearly that resetting the ECU on I think a 94 Civic led to temporarily higher gas mileage.
#20
Fish Twig
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Still hunting that foo up there
Posts: 15,555
Received 309 Likes
on
285 Posts
Re: Fuel economy problems 96 HX
You're probably not maintaining lean burn mode therefore your mpg is not consistent. How are gauging your mpg anyways? It needs to be solid proof and not some guestimate.
#21
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
Re: Fuel economy problems 96 HX
It does sound like you're calculating mileage correctly... keep in mind that a single fill is wildly variable. I would recommend logging mileage in Excel or on a site like fuelly.com. Fuelly is nice, you can just text your fuel-up details to the website and it tracks it for you
#22
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Fuel economy problems 96 HX
No, the HX/VX still get good gas mileage without the leanburn. Besides 12 valve operation and lean burn, the HX and VX have taller gears which put the cruising RPM much lower than the EX/DX/LX (coupe) transmissions. Even without lean burn you should expect MPG better than the D16Y7.
MPG calculations are most accurate when doing it from a tank fillup. You should fill up the tank, reset the trip, drive the car at least 3/4 of the tank, and then fill it to the top again. Your MPG is your trip distance / gallons filled. The scangauge and other gauges are reliant on these manual calculations to make sure they are calibrated, so they shouldn't be used by themselves for accurate MPG numbers. Also, the HX doesn't work correctly with the OBDII MPG computers because they don't factor in the changing A/F ratios in their MPG calculation. Like slogfilet said, it's best to manually track tank MPG over weeks and months rather than just look at one fill.
I would borrow a wideband O2 sensor and check your exhaust. Maybe the ECU is running the motor rich and you don't know it. But you need to start checking the obvious things like compression before you buy more parts. It doesn't make sense that these single parts would cause the MPG to jump up and then go back down. I'll mention slogfilet's comments again, make sure you are reporting your MPG correctly and over a period of a few fills.
One other thing you can try that is free and easy to do: Unplug the primary O2 sensor. I know you said it's a new NTK unit, but perhaps it is faulty causing the motor to run rich. By unplugging it you run the car in open loop mode which runs it at a constant A/F ratio. You should still get good MPG in open loop mode. I had to drive like this for a month or two while waiting on my new O2 sensor. I was still able to average 40 mpg in open loop mode. If your MPG improves significantly over the course of a few tanks, you know your O2 sensor or another sensor in the closed loop is bad.
MPG calculations are most accurate when doing it from a tank fillup. You should fill up the tank, reset the trip, drive the car at least 3/4 of the tank, and then fill it to the top again. Your MPG is your trip distance / gallons filled. The scangauge and other gauges are reliant on these manual calculations to make sure they are calibrated, so they shouldn't be used by themselves for accurate MPG numbers. Also, the HX doesn't work correctly with the OBDII MPG computers because they don't factor in the changing A/F ratios in their MPG calculation. Like slogfilet said, it's best to manually track tank MPG over weeks and months rather than just look at one fill.
I would borrow a wideband O2 sensor and check your exhaust. Maybe the ECU is running the motor rich and you don't know it. But you need to start checking the obvious things like compression before you buy more parts. It doesn't make sense that these single parts would cause the MPG to jump up and then go back down. I'll mention slogfilet's comments again, make sure you are reporting your MPG correctly and over a period of a few fills.
One other thing you can try that is free and easy to do: Unplug the primary O2 sensor. I know you said it's a new NTK unit, but perhaps it is faulty causing the motor to run rich. By unplugging it you run the car in open loop mode which runs it at a constant A/F ratio. You should still get good MPG in open loop mode. I had to drive like this for a month or two while waiting on my new O2 sensor. I was still able to average 40 mpg in open loop mode. If your MPG improves significantly over the course of a few tanks, you know your O2 sensor or another sensor in the closed loop is bad.
#23
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Western Hemisphere
Posts: 655
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Fuel economy problems 96 HX
What about your tires?
Just because the engine has 80k miles doesn't mean you shouldn't do a compression check. It's still the best lead you have.
Just because the engine has 80k miles doesn't mean you shouldn't do a compression check. It's still the best lead you have.
#24
Fish Twig
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Still hunting that foo up there
Posts: 15,555
Received 309 Likes
on
285 Posts
Re: Fuel economy problems 96 HX
No, the HX/VX still get good gas mileage without the leanburn. Besides 12 valve operation and lean burn, the HX and VX have taller gears which put the cruising RPM much lower than the EX/DX/LX (coupe) transmissions. Even without lean burn you should expect MPG better than the D16Y7.
MPG calculations are most accurate when doing it from a tank fillup. You should fill up the tank, reset the trip, drive the car at least 3/4 of the tank, and then fill it to the top again. Your MPG is your trip distance / gallons filled. The scangauge and other gauges are reliant on these manual calculations to make sure they are calibrated, so they shouldn't be used by themselves for accurate MPG numbers. Also, the HX doesn't work correctly with the OBDII MPG computers because they don't factor in the changing A/F ratios in their MPG calculation. Like slogfilet said, it's best to manually track tank MPG over weeks and months rather than just look at one fill.
I would borrow a wideband O2 sensor and check your exhaust. Maybe the ECU is running the motor rich and you don't know it. But you need to start checking the obvious things like compression before you buy more parts. It doesn't make sense that these single parts would cause the MPG to jump up and then go back down. I'll mention slogfilet's comments again, make sure you are reporting your MPG correctly and over a period of a few fills.
One other thing you can try that is free and easy to do: Unplug the primary O2 sensor. I know you said it's a new NTK unit, but perhaps it is faulty causing the motor to run rich. By unplugging it you run the car in open loop mode which runs it at a constant A/F ratio. You should still get good MPG in open loop mode. I had to drive like this for a month or two while waiting on my new O2 sensor. I was still able to average 40 mpg in open loop mode. If your MPG improves significantly over the course of a few tanks, you know your O2 sensor or another sensor in the closed loop is bad.
MPG calculations are most accurate when doing it from a tank fillup. You should fill up the tank, reset the trip, drive the car at least 3/4 of the tank, and then fill it to the top again. Your MPG is your trip distance / gallons filled. The scangauge and other gauges are reliant on these manual calculations to make sure they are calibrated, so they shouldn't be used by themselves for accurate MPG numbers. Also, the HX doesn't work correctly with the OBDII MPG computers because they don't factor in the changing A/F ratios in their MPG calculation. Like slogfilet said, it's best to manually track tank MPG over weeks and months rather than just look at one fill.
I would borrow a wideband O2 sensor and check your exhaust. Maybe the ECU is running the motor rich and you don't know it. But you need to start checking the obvious things like compression before you buy more parts. It doesn't make sense that these single parts would cause the MPG to jump up and then go back down. I'll mention slogfilet's comments again, make sure you are reporting your MPG correctly and over a period of a few fills.
One other thing you can try that is free and easy to do: Unplug the primary O2 sensor. I know you said it's a new NTK unit, but perhaps it is faulty causing the motor to run rich. By unplugging it you run the car in open loop mode which runs it at a constant A/F ratio. You should still get good MPG in open loop mode. I had to drive like this for a month or two while waiting on my new O2 sensor. I was still able to average 40 mpg in open loop mode. If your MPG improves significantly over the course of a few tanks, you know your O2 sensor or another sensor in the closed loop is bad.
Actually these vtec-e civics are mainly bought for the fact that the lean burn does effectively gets you mpg, if it weren't for the vtec-e anybody would've bought a y7 instead and would be saving gas at the pump.