Lower ball joint replacement
#1
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Kennesaw, Ga., USA
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Lower ball joint replacement
I have a 98 Accord 4-cyl. with 201k miles. I am the original owner and the lower ball joints are original. One boot (dust boot) on the passanger side has a hole in it and is leaking slightly. With 201k miles should I go ahead and replace both lower ball joints or just replace the dust boot that has a hole in it? I'm planning on keeping the car forever. Thanks.
#2
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Lower ball joint replacement
it would be much easier and cost effective to just replace the boots that are torn, as long as the joint is still good. add some new grease if you only do the boot job.
#3
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Kennesaw, Ga., USA
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Lower ball joint replacement
At 201k the lower ball joints on both sides could fail soon right? Maybe I should just replace them both and be done with it. What do you guys think?
#4
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Lower ball joint replacement
not necessarily. they should never "fail", just start to wear and get loose. There will be much more work involved to change the joints compared to changing the boots. if you test the joints by jacking the car up under the lower arm and trying to pry the wheel up, you may find some slack. if so, replace the joints. if not, I'd save some time and money by installing a boot and regreasing. will probably go another 100k if you caught it soon enough.
#5
Seagull Management
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Miramichi, NB, Canada
Posts: 15,150
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes
on
22 Posts
Re: Lower ball joint replacement
not necessarily. they should never "fail", just start to wear and get loose. There will be much more work involved to change the joints compared to changing the boots. if you test the joints by jacking the car up under the lower arm and trying to pry the wheel up, you may find some slack. if so, replace the joints. if not, I'd save some time and money by installing a boot and regreasing. will probably go another 100k if you caught it soon enough.
#6
be professional
Re: Lower ball joint replacement
If you can feel any play, replace the joint. No play = no need to replace.
Trending Topics
#8
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Lower ball joint replacement
At 201K i wouldn't expect a whole lot more life out of them, but if you're going to replace them and plan on keeping the car buy genuine honda ball joints, you wont get that kind of ridiculous mileage out of cheap parts store ball joints.
They'll get loose first, but they will eventually fail and seperate if left alone. Seen it before. Lower ball joint seperates and first thing your car's in the ditch. That said if theres no play in the joints then you can always just put a new boot on and check for play at least once a year.
They'll get loose first, but they will eventually fail and seperate if left alone. Seen it before. Lower ball joint seperates and first thing your car's in the ditch. That said if theres no play in the joints then you can always just put a new boot on and check for play at least once a year.
if you are dismantling the suspension for other things, then go ahead and replace the joints. if not, it will take some work to get the axle and other stuff disconnected to replace them. it's easiest with the knuckle off the car.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
retriever99
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
9
01-08-2020 07:12 AM