RSX SWAP!
#1
RSX SWAP!
hello, i got a k24a2 block to drop in my rsx deciding on what head, either a k20a3 ported, k20a2 not ported or k24a2 ported head? whats going to get me the most power? i am going to be rebuilding these with cams, valves, etc.. any suggestions??
#2
Crazy Honda Guy
Re: RSX SWAP!
If you have an k24a2 head already, use it. If you have to source out a head, either an k20A2 or Z3 head should work great. Personally, I wouldn't worry about porting too much....but valve stems are not a bad idea
#5
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Jacksonville, FL, usa
Posts: 885
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes
on
16 Posts
Re: RSX SWAP!
k20a2 has bigger ports and will yield higher peak power
k24a2 has smaller ports and has more mid range power and lower end power less peak power than the k20a2.
And yes you can still make 350whp after you swap it. Just make sure you have it tuned good.
k24a2 has smaller ports and has more mid range power and lower end power less peak power than the k20a2.
And yes you can still make 350whp after you swap it. Just make sure you have it tuned good.
#6
Re: RSX SWAP!
i have an 06 k24a2 but if its worth putting the a2 head i will do it. money is not an issue i just want the best numbers i can get in this setup. spaz you said you were making 438 but your tranny is prolly built i dont plan on that i just plan on putting lsd and leaving it stock.
Trending Topics
#8
Re: RSX SWAP!
this is only true with the 05< years. 06-08 the K24A2 is better than the k20A2 in every way. Even the head. Before 06 the heads were very similar still even.
#10
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Jacksonville, FL, usa
Posts: 885
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes
on
16 Posts
Re: RSX SWAP!
I did a lot of work on a flow bench last month to compare CRv head , Type s, and TSx head. I did a test on the TSX and the Type s with adapter and the CRV wihout adaptor. The result are:
Lift TSX CFM Type S CFM CRV (without adaptor)
.0500 50.2 43.9 61.5
.1000 105.07 96.9 111.7
.1500 139.00 107.9 155.1
.2000 176.00 134.4 192.8
,2500 204.5 175.2 222.7
.3000 229.1 207.00 245.0
.3500 247.5 233.1 259.2
.4000 260.00 253.00 269.3
.4500 268.4 257.4 275.8
.5000 273.6 269.5 281.8
.5500 274.1 281.2 286.2
.6000 276.2 287.6 289.5
.6500 275.4 292.5 291.2
.7000 276.4 296.6 293.4
You can see that the TSX is better below .5500 of lift and the Type S is better over .5500. This is normal because the Type s run higher RPM than the TSX and the TSX need more torque at low lift. For me the TSX head have more potential than the Type s have if you did a porting job. I will do this job next month and I will give you my result.
The surprise here is the CRV head. The shape with my eyes at the intake look the same that the Type s look. But the flow is really better than the Type S at low lift and equal over .6000 lift. But last year when I did this flow on the CRV head, I did that without adaptor. I will repeat this test with adaptor and give you the result. If this head is really better than the TSX and the Type s, without porting, it's going to be sad that this head didn't have the third spring holes.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
black99x
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
2
09-27-2006 04:18 PM
mustninty
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
3
08-22-2004 07:09 AM