Top end HELP d16z6
#1
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Atlantic City NJ
Posts: 598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Top end HELP d16z6
Currently Building my first d16z6, and going to have jeff evans tune it. I know every set up is different, I just want to know if im being realistic about my power gains.
Bottom up:
-knife edged z6 crank
-reused my main bolts
-eagle rods
-weisco 8.5 to 1 75.5mm turbo pistons
-topline gasket kit/bearings (all clearances checked out thus far)
-balanced rotating assembly from fidanza to crank pulley
-gt28rs turbo with a .63 ex housing, spoolin quick4ac manifold going to be swain tech coated, and soon to be 3" exhaust (just got a ws2, dont really want to sell it but evans says i have to)
-going to get valve springs and retainers (either crower or bisi)
so heres my question- i want to max the turbo out at 375whp, is that realistic on a stock cam/cam gear? it was done here
(http://dynos.evans-tuning.com/2010/1...p255tq-retune/)
and based on cam profiles from this article (http://www.turbod16.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=48083) the bisi 2.4 far surpasses the crower stage 2. eventually im going to shoot for the bisi, but as far as a top end, what in your opinion would be my best bet?
Bottom up:
-knife edged z6 crank
-reused my main bolts
-eagle rods
-weisco 8.5 to 1 75.5mm turbo pistons
-topline gasket kit/bearings (all clearances checked out thus far)
-balanced rotating assembly from fidanza to crank pulley
-gt28rs turbo with a .63 ex housing, spoolin quick4ac manifold going to be swain tech coated, and soon to be 3" exhaust (just got a ws2, dont really want to sell it but evans says i have to)
-going to get valve springs and retainers (either crower or bisi)
so heres my question- i want to max the turbo out at 375whp, is that realistic on a stock cam/cam gear? it was done here
(http://dynos.evans-tuning.com/2010/1...p255tq-retune/)
and based on cam profiles from this article (http://www.turbod16.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=48083) the bisi 2.4 far surpasses the crower stage 2. eventually im going to shoot for the bisi, but as far as a top end, what in your opinion would be my best bet?
#4
Re: Top end HELP d16z6
No that turbo is more than capable of making that power. The most over looked parts when balancing a motor is the rods and pistons. They will need to be balanced as well. The cranks from Honda are very good from factory the part I that is most off is the pistons and rods. Who ever balanced ur crank should of told u this. Good luck
#6
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Atlantic City NJ
Posts: 598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Top end HELP d16z6
rods and pistons are balanced// Everything is balanced; OEM crank pulley, crank, pistons and rods, and my fidanza flywheel. I want to be sure my power goals are reaslistic with a stock cam/cam gear. I dont want to go to evans tuning and have them tell me all i needed was an adj cam gear to get to 375.
Trending Topics
#9
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: schooling kids in ny, usa
Posts: 9,813
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes
on
9 Posts
Re: Top end HELP d16z6
its not a volkswagon.. no need to run 20 something psi to get the power that a larger but still well matched turbo can do in 15ish psi just to say you run 2x psi. get a compressor map and do the math, id bet you are out of the inner circles of efficiency...
ok, there it is. id say roughly that you will need 20is or a tiny bit more psi. translated to the map, you are looking at pressure ratios of between 2.25 and 2.5. look how far up on the map it is...spinning the turbo in the range of 140,000 rpm. as i see it you would be somewhere around 68-70% efficient. to me it looks that turbo will be better somewhere between 15 to 20 psi, but not much over that...
ok, there it is. id say roughly that you will need 20is or a tiny bit more psi. translated to the map, you are looking at pressure ratios of between 2.25 and 2.5. look how far up on the map it is...spinning the turbo in the range of 140,000 rpm. as i see it you would be somewhere around 68-70% efficient. to me it looks that turbo will be better somewhere between 15 to 20 psi, but not much over that...
#10
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Atlantic City NJ
Posts: 598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Top end HELP d16z6
ok, there it is. id say roughly that you will need 20is or a tiny bit more psi. translated to the map, you are looking at pressure ratios of between 2.25 and 2.5. look how far up on the map it is...spinning the turbo in the range of 140,000 rpm. as i see it you would be somewhere around 68-70% efficient. to me it looks that turbo will be better somewhere between 15 to 20 psi, but not much over that...
Thanks for all the help and keep it coming
#11
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Atlantic City NJ
Posts: 598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Top end HELP d16z6
with all this talk about the turbo maxing out I forgot to mention that im running rc 550's that will inevitably be at 95% of their duty cycle for a race tune (Assuming i achieve ~375whp )
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bseriescivic5
Classifieds: Forced Induction
2
04-04-2004 03:18 PM