T3 T67 HO spool versus a GT4088
10-27-2007, 03:12 PM
#1
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: bolton, ontario, canada
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
T3 T67 HO spool versus a GT4088
Hey like the title says I am wonder what the spool characteristics of those two turbos? like how much of a difference there is in the spool up of those two turbos
TIA
TIA
10-27-2007, 05:56 PM
#4
Re: T3 T67 HO spool versus a GT4088 (chubz0r)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by chubz0r »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">dont mean to thread jack, but does anybody know how the t3t67ho and 4088r will compare vs a S366? </TD></TR></TABLE>
Seen many things with all three. S366 has lower IATs, a bit more capable hp, in mid-range and top end. and will easily handle the T67, 4088R/S366 comparisons are still subjective but comparable.
Don't jack the thread, pm those who have used all three, or BW dealers who have also the GT4088R at their disposal.
Seen many things with all three. S366 has lower IATs, a bit more capable hp, in mid-range and top end. and will easily handle the T67, 4088R/S366 comparisons are still subjective but comparable.
Don't jack the thread, pm those who have used all three, or BW dealers who have also the GT4088R at their disposal.
10-27-2007, 09:20 PM
#5
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: T3 T67 HO spool versus a GT4088 (TheShodan)
the original question was asked for me. can anyone help me so i know what im looking at when ordering a new turbo. i've seen a dyno plot for a similiar motor using a t3/t67 ball bearing and would like to know the difference in spool as im interested in using a 4088r or even a borg warner.
10-28-2007, 09:08 AM
#6
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Tallahassee, FL, US
Posts: 7,190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would honestly never recommend the t3/67 to anyone after using it. That's just too much compressor wheel for a t3 hot side even if they did cram a p trim wheel into it. A better comparison is 4088 and t4/67, and I would go with the 4088r for the powerband.
10-28-2007, 09:41 AM
#7
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: atlanta, ga
Posts: 466
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
well, i wasnt going to reply to this post because i only have experience with the t3/t67 h.o. But in responce to jaren, i love my h.o. it comes on smoothly, hell of power potential, and good responce.
Trending Topics
10-28-2007, 10:43 AM
#8
Re: (Jared)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Jared »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I would honestly never recommend the t3/67 to anyone after using it. That's just too much compressor wheel for a t3 hot side even if they did cram a p trim wheel into it. A better comparison is 4088 and t4/67, and I would go with the 4088r for the powerband.</TD></TR></TABLE>
The S366 powerband would also would be much better in the T4 platform, since it uses a larger turbine wheel than a P-Trim.
The S366 powerband would also would be much better in the T4 platform, since it uses a larger turbine wheel than a P-Trim.
10-28-2007, 05:23 PM
#9
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Tallahassee, FL, US
Posts: 7,190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (TheShodan)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by TheShodan »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
The S366 powerband would also would be much better in the T4 platform, since it uses a larger turbine wheel than a P-Trim. </TD></TR></TABLE>
do you have a dyno graph to compare them?
The S366 powerband would also would be much better in the T4 platform, since it uses a larger turbine wheel than a P-Trim. </TD></TR></TABLE>
do you have a dyno graph to compare them?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fled
Forced Induction
3
03-04-2005 03:46 PM
