SOHC torque specs
09-03-2005, 09:18 PM
#3
Honda-Tech Member
Re: SOHC torque specs (SOHCboost)
60ft/lb with moly.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SOHCboost »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i got sum ARp head studs wat should i torque 2? </TD></TR></TABLE>
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SOHCboost »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i got sum ARp head studs wat should i torque 2? </TD></TR></TABLE>
09-03-2005, 10:41 PM
#4
Re: SOHC torque specs (93supercoupe)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 93supercoupe »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Also, can I use my GSR headstuds in my y8?</TD></TR></TABLE>
You wish.
Although I guess you could whittle then down to 10mm and they'd fit.
You wish.
Although I guess you could whittle then down to 10mm and they'd fit.
09-03-2005, 10:53 PM
#5
Honda-Tech Member
Re: SOHC torque specs (SOHCboost)
I personally torque them to 75ft/lbs w/ARP moly lube. Everybody seems to have their own preference though.
Do you mind giving details on your R.I.P. setup that went 12.1 @ 112?
Do you mind giving details on your R.I.P. setup that went 12.1 @ 112?
09-03-2005, 11:22 PM
#6
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Tampa
Posts: 5,401
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: SOHC torque specs (JFK78)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JFK78 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Do you mind giving details on your R.I.P. setup that went 12.1 @ 112? </TD></TR></TABLE>
id like to know as well.
</TD></TR></TABLE>id like to know as well.
Trending Topics
09-04-2005, 12:36 PM
#9
Honda-Tech Member
Re: (SOHCboost)
I really like the ZEX cam. Better midrange and top-end. I run stock valvetrain and rev to 7500rpm.
Your setup: What size turbo, injectors, slicks? How did it blow?
Your setup: What size turbo, injectors, slicks? How did it blow?
09-05-2005, 05:29 PM
#10
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: 239, FL
Posts: 1,753
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (JFK78)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JFK78 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I really like the ZEX cam. Better midrange and top-end. I run stock valvetrain and rev to 7500rpm.
Your setup: What size turbo, injectors, slicks? How did it blow?
</TD></TR></TABLE>
The Zex 59300 cam is great, especially for boost applications. I wouldnt recommend running stock valvetrain with it though, because of the higher lift could cause lifting of the valves. When upgrading, i would definitely go with the Crower Springs/Ti-retainers
Your setup: What size turbo, injectors, slicks? How did it blow?
</TD></TR></TABLE>
The Zex 59300 cam is great, especially for boost applications. I wouldnt recommend running stock valvetrain with it though, because of the higher lift could cause lifting of the valves. When upgrading, i would definitely go with the Crower Springs/Ti-retainers
09-05-2005, 06:52 PM
#11
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: ridgecrest, ca
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (1995Civic)
duh. the cam is meant to lift the valves... you probably meant "without the valvespring upgrade, the higher ramprate, and lift on the zex cam could induce valve-float at higher rpm"
09-06-2005, 06:28 PM
#12
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: 239, FL
Posts: 1,753
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (AMkrew_1)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by AMkrew_1 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> duh. the cam is meant to lift the valves...
you probably meant "without the valvespring upgrade, the higher ramprate, and lift on the zex cam could induce valve-float at higher rpm"</TD></TR></TABLE>
true that homie! my bad for the false statement. Was a long night 
duh. the cam is meant to lift the valves... you probably meant "without the valvespring upgrade, the higher ramprate, and lift on the zex cam could induce valve-float at higher rpm"</TD></TR></TABLE>
true that homie! my bad for the false statement. Was a long night
09-06-2005, 06:33 PM
#13
Honda-Tech Member
Re: (1995Civic)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 1995Civic »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">The Zex 59300 cam is great, especially for boost applications. I wouldnt recommend running stock valvetrain with it though, because of the higher lift could cause lifting of the valves. When upgrading, i would definitely go with the Crower Springs/Ti-retainers </TD></TR></TABLE>
the zex valespring upgrade will do just fine
</TD></TR></TABLE>the zex valespring upgrade will do just fine
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
