Notices
Acura Integra Type-R All Integra Type R Discussions

Supra VS TypeR

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-13-2001, 10:54 AM
  #1  
New User
Thread Starter
 
R-Adrenaline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: TX, USA
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Supra VS TypeR

Can anyone give me a good explanation of what the positives and negatives are of a Supra over a Type R and visa versa? What are the differences in handling? Differences in speed over the R with the non TT supra and the TT Supra? I know that the TT is a monster but I just wanted #'s. Does the R excel in any category? i.e. gas consumption, weight, engine reliability? Just wanting information for my own knowledge. Thanks!
Old 12-13-2001, 10:57 AM
  #2  
Future Texas Boy
 
vtecvoodoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: SoCal Redneck
Posts: 18,889
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Supra VS TypeR (R-Adrenaline)

apples n oranges
Old 12-13-2001, 11:02 AM
  #3  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Rdriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: VA/NC, usa
Posts: 1,056
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: Supra VS TypeR (R-Adrenaline)

I wish you could talk to one of my friends. He had a 98 R and a 98 supra TT. After he sold the R he missed it. The R is a better daily driver. I would get an R over a NA supra any day. The TT is a beast. I have never seen a faster street car. 450 whp with only $1000 in mods.
Old 12-13-2001, 11:06 AM
  #4  
Honda-Tech Member
 
jond's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 4,406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Supra VS TypeR (R-Adrenaline)

non-turbo supra is a girls car. 15 second 1/4 miles.
Old 12-13-2001, 11:26 AM
  #5  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Cosworth's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Fairbanks
Posts: 6,402
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Supra VS TypeR (jond)

non-turbo supra is a girls car. 15 second 1/4 miles.
I will still take it if I saw a pristine one. 240 (or was it 222) HP inline6 is very smooth. Plus, you can add boost later. I love the sound of BOV on Supra TT's. mmm.

If I could build a car, it would have I-6 with 8,500 rpm redline + rwd setup and weigh ~2500 lbs. The only thing that almost fits the description at this time is E46 M3... but I don't have $$$.
Old 12-13-2001, 11:26 AM
  #6  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Black SVT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Found On Road Dead., usa
Posts: 3,266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Supra VS TypeR (jond)

I can't say the non TT excites me much.Your friend that now has a Supra and misses the ITR has issues.Supras are just as reliable,just as fun and are much faster.
Old 12-13-2001, 11:32 AM
  #7  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Rdriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: VA/NC, usa
Posts: 1,056
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: Supra VS TypeR (R-Adrenaline)

He had both the supra and R at the same time. The R was his daily driver. He abuses cars, and the R handled abuse well....More caution must be taken with 450 whp rear wheel drive car.
Old 12-13-2001, 11:35 AM
  #8  
Member
 
austrian type-R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: official euro R hospital, AUSTRIA
Posts: 4,567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Supra VS TypeR (Rdriver)

I don´t like the look of a Supra. Without a bodykit the Supra is kinda ugly viewing it from the front. The lights are too big in my case. It is a nice sports car, but you can not compare it to a type-R. 2 different classes.
Old 12-13-2001, 11:41 AM
  #9  
New User
 
slash00R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Supra VS TypeR (austrian ITR)

A friend of mine is selling his green NA Supra '97 Special Edition in pristine condition if anyone is interested. He was asking 25 or 26k last time I checked - he's working on a cruise ship right now so he doesn't need a car (bastard). I got to drive it - it's very smooth but more of a cruiser IMO. I'll stick with the R for now
Old 12-13-2001, 11:42 AM
  #10  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Black R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Atlantis
Posts: 12,948
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default Re: Supra VS TypeR (R-Adrenaline)

Supra = 4k lb, i6, tt, FR, bulletproof engine.

itr = best car under $25k, nimble, tossable, very reliable, cult classic.

I'll take one of each please!

Seriously, the only car that has characteristics of both is the FD in r1 or r3 trim...

And the above sum up my dream garage. :sigh:
Old 12-13-2001, 11:44 AM
  #11  
Honda-Tech Member
 
hybrid_eg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,004
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Supra VS TypeR (vtecvoodoo)

apples n oranges
hahaha good one ryan.. if you are going to get a supra dont even thing about the non-turbo one.. its all about the TT

the handling difference i wouldnt know.. since i drive the car 99% on the street/hwy i know what i need but my R isnt givin it' to me
Supra will respond quite well to engine mods.. all the little upgrades will give you lot of power comparing to the R.. hmm i wish i had bought one.. and dumped the same amount of money that i did in the R.. i'd be driving one crazy stupra by NOW!
Old 12-13-2001, 12:04 PM
  #12  
Honda-Tech Member
 
apexii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EDITED, PA
Posts: 2,264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Supra VS TypeR (Black R)

Supra = 4k lb, i6, tt, FR, bulletproof engine.
itr = best car under $25k, nimble, tossable, very reliable, cult classic.
All very true. I know that if I drove a TT in the same fashion I drive the R; I'd be dead in days. The TT is a lot of car, more than I can handle i'd bet.. The R is waay more forgiving, and that's including LTO syndrome!

apex- who is happy with his R but contemplated the TT........
Old 12-13-2001, 12:18 PM
  #13  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Etylorcen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 3,070
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Supra VS TypeR (apexii)

Get a NA supra if you plan on going single turbo...t66 yum.
Old 12-13-2001, 02:44 PM
  #14  
New User
 
JSpecwest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Vancouver, WA, USA
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Supra VS TypeR (Etylorcen)

Ummm....I think it would be better to put a single turbo on the Supra TT.
Old 12-13-2001, 02:56 PM
  #15  
Honda-Tech Member
 
naturalvx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Orlando, Fl, USA
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Supra VS TypeR (R-Adrenaline)

That's what I work with all day long , Supra TT's and it's a truly incredible car. Expensive to mod, but you get your moneys worth. For about 10k into it you can have a 850+ daily driven supra TT with no NOS. That's good for high 9s-low 10s and you can drive it home. In a straight line no ITR can touch that. On a roadcourse it's a whole nother animal but If it where me right now I'd take the ITR. If this was a few years from now where i have the extra money then I'll have a TT.
Old 12-13-2001, 03:22 PM
  #16  
Honda-Tech Member
 
EG8R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,466
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Supra VS TypeR (naturalvx)

ITR ITR ITR NOT SUPRA TT ITR ITR ITR
Old 12-13-2001, 03:57 PM
  #17  
New User
 
tjtruong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: NorCal/SoCal, United States
Posts: 2,246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Supra VS TypeR (mr. skelly)

ITR ITR ITR NOT SUPRA TT ITR ITR ITR
thats what i'm talking about ITR
Old 12-13-2001, 04:08 PM
  #18  
Honda-Tech Member
 
py1188's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Supra VS TypeR (JSpecwest)

Ummm....I think it would be better to put a single turbo on the Supra TT.
Very true!!

I have a budy here in Chicago with a tt with a single turbo upgrade. Its a street driven car with ac and a radio pushing more boost than ever thought it could handle with over 160 mph trap speeds. I'm not too sure if any of you recall but this summer he actually called out John Hennessey(viper). They were supposed to do some race down in Texas, 1 mile. It was all over the internet for a while. That is one quick car.
Old 12-13-2001, 05:18 PM
  #19  
New User
 
GettaluvR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Toronto/Taipei, Canada/Taiwan
Posts: 1,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Supra VS TypeR (py1188)

my friend had a 94 TT supra about couple month ago b4 he trade in for m roadster.
we use to race sometimes b4 there was no way i could follow that car, way too fast, but one thing for sure the handling is not good as R. i've drove it couple times. the car was too heavy, it made really diffcult to turn, however even tho on track i still cant keep up with supra coz everytime when we reach straight line that car is just GONE. i could only hear the "below off" sound from his turbo.
and he told my with $1000 that car can simply go to 400 hp, just need to modify the chip. i'd say R and supra TT are two different level cars, there is no way u can compare them
Old 12-13-2001, 05:23 PM
  #20  
Honda-Tech Member
 
hybrid_eg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,004
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Supra VS TypeR (GettaluvR)

you mean "blow off" eh? jfwy...
Old 12-13-2001, 06:54 PM
  #21  
Honda-Tech Member
 
mugenr#1011's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: all mugen all the time, usa
Posts: 1,422
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Supra VS TypeR (GettaluvR)

my friend had a 94 TT supra about couple month ago b4 he trade in for m roadster.
we use to race sometimes b4 there was no way i could follow that car, way too fast, but one thing for sure the handling is not good as R. i've drove it couple times. the car was too heavy, it made really diffcult to turn, however even tho on track i still cant keep up with supra coz everytime when we reach straight line that car is just GONE. i could only hear the "below off" sound from his turbo.
and he told my with $1000 that car can simply go to 400 hp, just need to modify the chip. i'd say R and supra TT are two different level cars, there is no way u can compare them
yeah what he said..haha
Old 12-13-2001, 07:49 PM
  #22  
Member
 
Mike D's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: MASSHOLE
Posts: 1,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Supra VS TypeR (mugenr#1011)

if you read SCC you might remember the article on the guy ( i think it was John Haferty????) who had a supra TT and was a Pro Solo driver on the national level. I believe he has won the nationals but dont quote me on it. I think set up right, the supra could very easily beat an itr on a road course, auto-x wouldnt be quite as easy but it is possible.

Now dont get me wrong, i love the R but im not nieve. I guess when it comes down to it, you have to realize what kind of car you are looking for.

In reality, most people set up their cars up to shine on the track when they spend most of the time on the street, and on teh street the TT will smoke an ITR.

I would get the TT.


Mike
Old 12-13-2001, 08:02 PM
  #23  
Honda-Tech Member
 
hybrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Greece
Posts: 5,838
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Supra VS TypeR (hennessey)

very true, with just one 1k in mods to the sup TT, your looking at around 450hp, crazy if you ask me, then again we are comparing apples to oranges
Old 12-13-2001, 09:16 PM
  #24  
Junior Member
 
forksports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: OR, USA
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Supra VS TypeR (R-Adrenaline)

I always think ITR is a great car all the way around, the looks, performance, handling. But I think Supra is a totally different car then the ITR and it couldn't be compare...the msrp on both cars are way different. I'm not saying the Supra TT is better than the ITR, is just that they're both in totally different class, Supra should be compared to RX-7, 300ZX, Skyline and so on. Out of the box the Supra TT will offer better performance obviously, and as handling wise Supra TT has a totally different characteristics than the ITR since it's an FR (I think RWD car is very fun to drive). As far as on the street HWY racing a fully tuned ITR will be smoked by a slightly tuned supra, with the right driver though

in conclusion, it all depends on what u want or what is your goal? The ITR will make a better grocery car on the weekdays (without all the thefts) and road race car on the weekends. The ITR gives better gas mileage and NA motor is far more reliable than turbo cars IMO. But the Supra TT will get more attention from the chicks , and the torque will make girls **** on their pants hehehe...allright enough for now
Old 12-13-2001, 09:29 PM
  #25  
Member
 
Rob :190:'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Charlotte, NC, USA
Posts: 5,980
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Supra VS TypeR (forksports)

I seriously looked at TT supras before I bought my R. As far as numbers go, they have the ITR by the *****. a $1500 investment will have you in the ~400rwhp range with a Lexus like idle. But the problem is the **** is so big and heavy, i didnt find them that much fun the drive. Yes it will hauls some serious ***, but its not that much fun to me. I could have gotten one, but I went with the ITR because its quick, nimble, and handling is its forte, which is what i wanted. Two different types of cars. Like someone mentioned, 400hp at the wheels is a lot to handle, I would be in jail or dead right now. **** i've gotten in enough trouble with ~170fwhp.

Dont buy an NA!!!! they have similar engines to the TT, but only just. you have to do some major building to get a NA single turbo to be as strong and reliable as a singled you started from a tt motor. Not to mention the TT has the great brakes, tranny and rear end.


Quick Reply: Supra VS TypeR



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:27 AM.