Notices
Acura Integra Type-R All Integra Type R Discussions

Auto Guide 98 ITR vs 13' Si

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-24-2013, 02:15 PM
  #1  
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
 
jordanitr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Auto Guide 98 ITR vs 13' Si

Good vid!!!
Old 07-24-2013, 05:41 PM
  #2  
Honda-Tech Member
 
98R#460's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Alabama, USA
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Auto Guide 98 ITR vs 13' Si

Cool! It's hard to believe how heavy Civics have become.
Old 07-24-2013, 05:57 PM
  #3  
RESIDENT
iTrader: (6)
 
TypeRfit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Tucson, Az
Posts: 2,771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Auto Guide 98 ITR vs 13' Si

Type R's are still faster.

Honda really needs to bring back the "fun" car to drive.
Old 07-25-2013, 04:12 AM
  #4  
Honda-Tech Member
 
rd91sib18c5r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: portland, Or, USA
Posts: 836
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Auto Guide 98 ITR vs 13' Si

Cool video, wish they would still use double wishbone suspension. The civic is as heavy
as the older accords lol.
Old 07-25-2013, 04:48 AM
  #5  
RESIDENT
iTrader: (6)
 
TypeRfit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Tucson, Az
Posts: 2,771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Auto Guide 98 ITR vs 13' Si

A new style eg/ek hatch under 2650lbs with a k24 making 220hp would put Honda back on the map. All of these new civics look like a$$
Old 07-25-2013, 05:29 AM
  #6  
Honda-Tech Member
 
aw614's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 677
Received 26 Likes on 23 Posts
Default Re: Auto Guide 98 ITR vs 13' Si

Originally Posted by rd91sib18c5r
Cool video, wish they would still use double wishbone suspension. The civic is as heavy
as the older accords lol.
I've noticed most of the competitors cars weigh in around the same or even a bit more than the civic. I find it surprising that honda has been able to keep the weight under 3000lb although with all those reviews slamming the 9th gen civic about it being cheaper and louder, I assume the weight went up for more sound isolation, etc...
Old 07-25-2013, 06:22 AM
  #7  
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (2)
 
ekcoupeh22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Auto Guide 98 ITR vs 13' Si

good video... I didn't know that about the windshields
Old 07-25-2013, 11:44 AM
  #8  
Honda-Tech Member
 
HYREV2NR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Dreaming of east Tennessee!
Posts: 4,251
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: Auto Guide 98 ITR vs 13' Si

Originally Posted by typerfit
A new style eg/ek hatch under 2650lbs with a k24 making 220hp would put Honda back on the map.
God wouldn't that be a dream come true?! Ive said the exact same thing for years now.

I was talking to the wife just a few days ago about Honda not having a single performance car or anything that remotely excites me when I see it now. The only car we'd remotely consider buying now is a CR-Z with the intentions of ripping it apart to K swap it but that would be so outrageously cost ineffective to do at the moment.
Old 07-25-2013, 12:43 PM
  #9  
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
 
jordanitr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Auto Guide 98 ITR vs 13' Si

Honda just sucks now, Including Acura's line up.
15 years later and it can't even beat the R is stupid!
The new Accord is really nice tho.. That's the only car in their current line up I would buy!
Old 07-25-2013, 12:55 PM
  #10  
RESIDENT
iTrader: (6)
 
TypeRfit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Tucson, Az
Posts: 2,771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Auto Guide 98 ITR vs 13' Si

Originally Posted by HYREV2NR
God wouldn't that be a dream come true?! Ive said the exact same thing for years now.

I was talking to the wife just a few days ago about Honda not having a single performance car or anything that remotely excites me when I see it now. The only car we'd remotely consider buying now is a CR-Z with the intentions of ripping it apart to K swap it but that would be so outrageously cost ineffective to do at the moment.
A current CR-Z with a K24 from the factory would be a new edition CRX. It seems like Honda has lost it's racing roots and is going for more comfort. F that. Give me a new rice box I can scoot around town in, not something my Grandma would own.
Old 07-25-2013, 08:26 PM
  #11  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Mr. Dabolina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Michigan
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Default Re: Auto Guide 98 ITR vs 13' Si

People have gotten fatter and stupider so cars need more "technology" to compensate for everyone's inability to drive.
Old 07-25-2013, 10:55 PM
  #12  
Honda-Tech Member
 
YellowKahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Costa Rica
Posts: 3,225
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: Auto Guide 98 ITR vs 13' Si

Old 07-26-2013, 09:52 AM
  #13  
Honda-Tech Member
 
dragon909boi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ca, UsA
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Auto Guide 98 ITR vs 13' Si

@ Dabolina LOL!!!
Old 07-26-2013, 10:21 AM
  #14  
Honda-Tech Member
 
espanol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: 106 and Park
Posts: 6,295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Auto Guide 98 ITR vs 13' Si

Originally Posted by typerfit
A new style eg/ek hatch under 2650lbs with a k24 making 220hp would put Honda back on the map. All of these new civics look like a$$
Yup. I had a chance to get a Mugen SI, and decided to go for another 13 year old ITR. Best decision ever.
Old 07-26-2013, 10:51 AM
  #15  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Black R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Atlantis
Posts: 12,948
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default Re: Auto Guide 98 ITR vs 13' Si

The itr on wider tires + 16 inch wheels vs the csi on all season tires?!

That fucked up the lap times right there!
Old 07-26-2013, 02:42 PM
  #16  
Painfully Stupid
iTrader: (1)
 
PaulMc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,112
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: Auto Guide 98 ITR vs 13' Si

Originally Posted by typerfit
A new style eg/ek hatch under 2650lbs with a k24 making 220hp would put Honda back on the map. All of these new civics look like a$$
I think the same style EG/EK would still sell. With some differences of course. But it seems the older I get the more retarded younger Honda owners get and their cars.
Old 07-26-2013, 04:57 PM
  #17  
RESIDENT
iTrader: (6)
 
TypeRfit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Tucson, Az
Posts: 2,771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Auto Guide 98 ITR vs 13' Si

Originally Posted by espanol
Yup. I had a chance to get a Mugen SI, and decided to go for another 13 year old ITR. Best decision ever.
I would have to agree, I didn't want a car payment so I built a Type R Sedan. It's a replica, but a f'n blast to drive.


Originally Posted by PaulMc
I think the same style EG/EK would still sell. With some differences of course. But it seems the older I get the more retarded younger Honda owners get and their cars.
I would agree. They could bring back the 98-01 GSR, EG/EK with a K, not changing 1 piece of body styling and they would fly off of the showroom floor. All of the 30+ year old OG's would have zero issue with a brand new GEH
Old 07-26-2013, 08:01 PM
  #18  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Demon R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: usa
Posts: 736
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Auto Guide 98 ITR vs 13' Si

Seeing these threads makes me not want to sell my R and get an S2000.
Old 07-26-2013, 10:09 PM
  #19  
Honda-Tech Member
 
R-Spec Ferio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Ripperside Ca
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Auto Guide 98 ITR vs 13' Si

s2k obsessed to lately too. but no denying MY true love for the B18C /B18C5/B16B. I hope to always own one.
Old 07-27-2013, 08:38 AM
  #20  
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
soulassassin13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Western Washington
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Auto Guide 98 ITR vs 13' Si

Great article!
Old 07-28-2013, 11:13 AM
  #21  
Honda-Tech Member
 
HYREV2NR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Dreaming of east Tennessee!
Posts: 4,251
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: Auto Guide 98 ITR vs 13' Si

Originally Posted by typerfit
I would have to agree, I didn't want a car payment so I built a Type R Sedan. It's a replica, but a f'n blast to drive.




I would agree. They could bring back the 98-01 GSR, EG/EK with a K, not changing 1 piece of body styling and they would fly off of the showroom floor. All of the 30+ year old OG's would have zero issue with a brand new GEH
I agree 100% but, isn't it a crying shame we think in this frame of mind because the car company we fell in love with so many years ago has disappointed us to this magnitude? Will we EVER see a decent Honda produced in the future that we REALLY get excited about? At this point I doubt it.
Old 07-28-2013, 11:42 AM
  #22  
RESIDENT
iTrader: (6)
 
TypeRfit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Tucson, Az
Posts: 2,771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Auto Guide 98 ITR vs 13' Si

Originally Posted by HYREV2NR
I agree 100% but, isn't it a crying shame we think in this frame of mind because the car company we fell in love with so many years ago has disappointed us to this magnitude? Will we EVER see a decent Honda produced in the future that we REALLY get excited about? At this point I doubt it.
We won't see another Honda that we fall in love with until Honda quits trying to compete in the comfort zone. Hyundai right now is killing it, almost all of their new cars are very good looking, and good to drive. Honda really does need to go back to their roots with small compact cars that you can whip around. Leave the comfort to the Acura line.
Old 07-28-2013, 01:28 PM
  #23  
Honda-Tech Member
 
aw614's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 677
Received 26 Likes on 23 Posts
Default Re: Auto Guide 98 ITR vs 13' Si

Originally Posted by typerfit
We won't see another Honda that we fall in love with until Honda quits trying to compete in the comfort zone. Hyundai right now is killing it, almost all of their new cars are very good looking, and good to drive. Honda really does need to go back to their roots with small compact cars that you can whip around. Leave the comfort to the Acura line.
Are the Hyundais that much better to drive? Outside of the Genesis, the rest of the line up isnt really that much sportier than Hondas. Most of the common complaints on a lot of the hyundais from reviews has been handling, steering, and shifter feel.
Old 07-28-2013, 01:37 PM
  #24  
RESIDENT
iTrader: (6)
 
TypeRfit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Tucson, Az
Posts: 2,771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Auto Guide 98 ITR vs 13' Si

Originally Posted by aw614
Are the Hyundais that much better to drive? Outside of the Genesis, the rest of the line up isnt really that much sportier than Hondas. Most of the common complaints on a lot of the hyundais from reviews has been handling, steering, and shifter feel.
Not really sportier, but better in the styling department. The new Accord does look real sharp though. I can't say I've thrown any Hyundais around in the corners so I wouldn't know. I have driven my friends turbo Sonata and that thing is pretty cool.
Old 07-28-2013, 01:59 PM
  #25  
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
safedriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 765
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default Re: Auto Guide 98 ITR vs 13' Si

I think that Honda/Acura is watering down the line, so they can find another car maker to merge with or, at least, to use the other company's engine.

Toyota/GM
Nissan/Ford
Mitsubishi/Chrysler
Honda/Yugo


Quick Reply: Auto Guide 98 ITR vs 13' Si



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:08 AM.